Page 381 of 567 FirstFirst ... 281331371379380381382383391431481 ... LastLast
Results 3,801 to 3,810 of 5670
  1. #3801
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,301
    Like
    0
    Liked 505 Times in 255 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by macebig View Post
    Looks like a Puma door hasn't yet closed for Mikkelsen...
    https://mobile.twitter.com/anlauto/s...73848721432580
    Of course not. If you have money...

  2. #3802
    Senior Member Andre Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,038
    Like
    1,619
    Liked 5,806 Times in 2,444 Posts
    9x


  3. Likes: dimviii (25th November 2021)
  4. #3803
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    830
    Like
    114
    Liked 495 Times in 272 Posts
    Loeb to Ford appears to be a done deal. Programme TBD.
    https://as.com/motor/2021/11/25/mas_...47_559529.html

  5. #3804
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,034
    Like
    344
    Liked 3,919 Times in 2,044 Posts
    The Puma testing car seems to have quite a lot of empty space in the wheelarches for tarmac spec car.

  6. #3805
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    1,127
    Like
    740
    Liked 505 Times in 284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    The Puma testing car seems to have quite a lot of empty space in the wheelarches for tarmac spec car.
    Could be for aero reasons.

  7. #3806
    Senior Member ictus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    175
    Like
    19
    Liked 142 Times in 85 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by becher View Post
    Could be for aero reasons.
    Yeah sure... If you want to have worse aero you make the gaps bigger, and the ride height taller

  8. Likes: AMSS (26th November 2021),Mirek (26th November 2021)
  9. #3807
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    1,127
    Like
    740
    Liked 505 Times in 284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ictus View Post
    Yeah sure... If you want to have worse aero you make the gaps bigger, and the ride height taller
    Haha, ride height and wheel arche design are not strictly related. An enclosed wheel arch that is not sufficiently vented produces a lot of lift, if the regulations don't allow for openings (see Yaris CD stack as a prime example) to vent the pressure, one solution is to make the gap between the wheel and the arch bigger (see TC1 cars from the WTCC). It might sound counter intuitiv, but a lot of aero stuff does.

  10. #3808
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    85
    Like
    164
    Liked 137 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by becher View Post
    Haha, ride height and wheel arche design are not strictly related. An enclosed wheel arch that is not sufficiently vented produces a lot of lift, if the regulations don't allow for openings (see Yaris CD stack as a prime example) to vent the pressure, one solution is to make the gap between the wheel and the arch bigger (see TC1 cars from the WTCC). It might sound counter intuitiv, but a lot of aero stuff does.
    I guess they could find better solutions... such as the internal conduct at the rear of the new Toyota GR Yaris Rally1, an alternative to the CD stack

    rear signed2.jpg
    WRCWings - Aerodynamics of WRC

  11. #3809
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    1,127
    Like
    740
    Liked 505 Times in 284 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lluisva555 View Post
    I guess they could find better solutions... such as the internal conduct at the rear of the new Toyota GR Yaris Rally1, an alternative to the CD stack

    rear signed2.jpg

    Yeah sure that can be a solution all though it is probably not a golden ticket in terms of drag either as its a bit of a bottel neck with a high pressure region somewhere. Also seems like a loophole they found as there was this talk about "no internal ducting"?

  12. Likes: lluisva555 (27th November 2021)
  13. #3810
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    85
    Like
    164
    Liked 137 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by becher View Post
    Yeah sure that can be a solution all though it is probably not a golden ticket in terms of drag either as its a bit of a bottel neck with a high pressure region somewhere. Also seems like a loophole they found as there was this talk about "no internal ducting"?
    Right, it is possibly the less bad solution. I also thought about regulations when I saw it. If they're able to use it, it's probably because FIA allowed them and other teams agreed, or... Hope this does not cause any controversy in the future
    WRCWings - Aerodynamics of WRC

  14. Likes: becher (27th November 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •