Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts

    Cool Antarctica- The worlds last great.....

    ......wilderness.

    The only place on Earth without an indigenous population, the worlds largest desert and plays a vital role in the Earths climate.

    But it is thought that under the ice it holds the largest fields of Oil and coal on the planet. However since 1998 they have been protected by the Antarctic Environmental Protocol, which prohibits any mineral extraction.

    But this ends in 50 years time. By then all of our other oil fields may have run dry, so would you favour exploiting Antarctica's reserves?

    My main query is who has rights to the oil? The 1959 Antarctic Treaty prevents any country from holding territorial rights to Antarctica, even though nations like Britain, Norway and Argentina claim territory, they aren't recognised.

    But would it be moral to exploit Antarctica?
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Barcelona, Catalunya, Spa
    Posts
    3,029
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    These are good questions, but they just don't matter. If it turns a profit, the exploitation will happen.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    1,489
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I feel a third world war brewing....
    Forza Ferrari!
    Michael Schumacher the best F1 driver ever

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Black Rock, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    3,866
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Australia claims the largest slice of this baby. Who really is able to exploit this resource depends on how the world is positioned in about 50 years time. Australia is not going to be able to gain any legitimate backing to Australian ownership of the land unless it is supported by some of the anglo countries. I would imagine that against the rise of China, India and some of the Asian powers; the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand might make some kind of formal treaty to share the resources should it come to that. But who knows, maybe oil will be made reduntant soon...

    Maybe we will realise that focusing on the extraction of raw minerals is actually inhibiting development rather than anything. I saw an interview with the author of the book 'the world is flat', and he was describing how people in countries like Saudi Arabia drill oil and rely on industry that generally delivers profit to the elites. Meanwhile, there are countries like Taiwan, who don't have any natural resource to rely on, and so, drill their people and develop democracy to better facilitate education and so on.

    Off the track a bit, but it really made me think...
    Mark Webber - Michael's master :cool:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •