Results 1 to 10 of 169
Hybrid View
-
21st September 2021, 16:50 #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 2,227
- Like
- 1
- Liked 1,228 Times in 665 Posts
It depens on what you consider dangerous.
The accident itself in monza was not dangerous at all, just wheels banging at low speed. But due to the curb trowing the car in the air the outcome was unexpectedly dangerous. In pretty much al other cases this would have been a completely forgettable moment.
Nobody could foresee that anything so dangerous was going to happen there.
But in silverstone, at those speeds, it was always going to be dangerous. Any 300 km/h crash is a big risk, even when in hindsight nobody got seriously hurt.
That's why these punishments are just not correct. Doing a stupid attempt at overtaking in a slow chicane is not comparable to doing a stupid attempt at overtaking in the fastest corner of the race.
-
21st September 2021, 19:37 #2
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,734
- Like
- 23
- Liked 834 Times in 688 Posts
I suppose, you need someone to die first before you acknowledge that it was dangerous. Knowing you, you would say the opposite if it was the Redcbull of Verstappen under the Mercedes of Hamilton. In this scenario, you can also imagine Horner spewing his heart out at how dangerous Hamilton was and why he should be banned from racing altogether for causing a crash and dumping his race car on Verstappen's head. Since the whiner lacks any sense of morality or a modicum of a sense of fairness, we have him asking for Hamilton to be penalized for being a victim in the crash.
Last edited by Nitrodaze; 21st September 2021 at 19:47.
Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
-
25th September 2021, 01:31 #3
-
25th September 2021, 18:26 #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
- Wichita, Kansas U.S.A
- Posts
- 860
- Like
- 16
- Liked 207 Times in 168 Posts
That is a little drama queenish. Drive to Survive loves him!
Like it or not - F1 Show. They need/want personalities. Because whether you like it or not - that is where the money is. They want social media presence, drama, personalities, Instagram, driver's girlfriends on youtube, etc. They are eating up the Toto vs. Horner.
Engineering is boring.
-
25th September 2021, 20:30 #5
-
25th September 2021, 21:11 #6
-
25th September 2021, 22:30 #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,303
- Like
- 727
- Liked 775 Times in 552 Posts
Have you really become so paranoid that you assume anyone who doesn't share your view has an hidden agenda against your favorite drivers, or have you become so arrogant that you think playing online psychologist suits you well? You seem to make a lot of arguments based on assumptions that you know a poster better than they know themselves, and it comes across as quite childish at best.
If something as simply as a clear yes or no question gets you all paranoid and pompous towards others, you really should rethink your views on posting in a public forum.
I could live without all the drama myself. But it has become more and more part of the show. Why? Because some believe all this game playing and crap talking really matters, when really it's been going on for years but not covered as much.
And though I'm not into the minutia to the extent that F1nKS is, I do enjoy the tech side of F1 as much as the racing. The fact that the series exists has led to a lot of automotive innovation in a number of areas. As a test bed the series is just amazing, with a lot of innovation banned not long after introduction. But the fact that it's now out and exists always leaves it there as potential for street cars and/or other series.
-
25th September 2021, 20:54 #8
It turned it with the wheel landing on his head it was dangerous, sure... but if you are comparing recklessness and the speed between the two incidents in terms of responsibility its not even close, but despite that, as some sort of warped point scoring exercise between both of them you still feel the need to compare them.
Not only do I find this fanatical and cultish but the fact that you feel the need to use them in that way tells me that you know deep down that the danger aspect of what Lewis did at Silverstone registered deeply within you... that you feel the need to try to diminish it by make a bigger deal about Monza.
Did he state that as being his reason?... or are you just whining your usual warped nonsensical pish?
Could it just be that Horner (rightly or wrongly) feels aggrieved, in that his driver got penalised and Lewis did not, when he feels that Lewis was just as much to blame?Last edited by Zico; 25th September 2021 at 21:29.
The emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!
Regarding Kalle, it really is the tyres.
[WRC] Delfi Rally Estonia 2025