Results 1 to 10 of 339

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,734
    Like
    23
    Liked 834 Times in 688 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
    I'd say it's around 70/30 in the incident , aligning with what Brundle read the FIA steward's decision to be , in terms of how the world press are seeing it .
    And , a great number of articles being written from all kinds of places are seeing the penalty as too small .

    Of course you folks defending Lewis will "poo poo" this post , but do look around and see you are in a great minority in your opinions on this one .
    I don't think the argument is to defend Hamilton per se. It is to state that it was a racing incident. And on this point, you would find most of the racing experts agree. Including Brundle.

    What most anti-Hamilton post on here has been trying to peddle, is that it was solely Hamilton's fault. And they begrudge him the fact that he won the race even with the penalty awarded.

    I and most posts on here refuting that notion and are simply saying it was a racing incident, and Verstappen was not an innocent party in the accident. The Palmer youtube podcast indicated more serious similar collisions in the past that were declared a racing incident and thus were not punished.

    If you are quoting from Fortitude's random sources which are mostly from non-racing specialists or Redbull's rhetorics, then l would have to say you have disappointed me.
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 21st July 2021 at 08:46.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  2. Likes: truefan72 (21st July 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •