Results 1 to 10 of 339
Threaded View
-
20th July 2021, 23:05 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,734
- Like
- 23
- Liked 834 Times in 688 Posts
I don't think the argument is to defend Hamilton per se. It is to state that it was a racing incident. And on this point, you would find most of the racing experts agree. Including Brundle.
What most anti-Hamilton post on here has been trying to peddle, is that it was solely Hamilton's fault. And they begrudge him the fact that he won the race even with the penalty awarded.
I and most posts on here refuting that notion and are simply saying it was a racing incident, and Verstappen was not an innocent party in the accident. The Palmer youtube podcast indicated more serious similar collisions in the past that were declared a racing incident and thus were not punished.
If you are quoting from Fortitude's random sources which are mostly from non-racing specialists or Redbull's rhetorics, then l would have to say you have disappointed me.Last edited by Nitrodaze; 21st July 2021 at 08:46.
Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
- Likes: truefan72 (21st July 2021)



Reply With Quote
Neuville, if he can get the car working.
Silly Season 2026