1. driven on normal roads, that are used for normal driving outside of rallies (else it's circuit racing or rallycross)
2. cars drive between stages on normal roads (else it's hillclimb)
3. cars resemble passenger vehicles that are driven and can be bought by public, resemble both in appearance, and method/style of propulsion. (else it's like autocross buggys, something "alien")
- so RWD cars from 1970s that nobody drives today are "historic" rallying for me, but not something to compete in on top level today
- when cars are run on petrol, rally cars should drive on petrol, when cars are hybrids, rally cars should be hybrids, when cars are electric, rally cars should be electric. At this very moment all 3 are available and used, so all 3 work for me). But running say on methanol like dragsters or something completely alien like an onboard chemical reactor (mixing 2 chemical components to generate energy) is just wrong for me. Similarly if in the future 99% of vehicles are electric, it would be wrong for me to have rallycars running on some synthetic petrol.
As many said, we have to adapt.
Adapting could mean no liasons. But stages like before. Of course cars people can buy. However that "autocross, alien" thing can be used on WRC17 cars as well.
"Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...
The Americans are going their own way with this new cost-effective alternative to European Rally2 Cars...
https://www.jrdmotorsport.com/arc2araspeccarupdates
With development and testing help...
Yep, the materials used were the issue. Drivers were begging fans to return any aero that came off their cars during a rally as they cost a fortune to replace.
I dont agree. If FIA and promoter works properly and has anything to offer, I am sure we should have 3-4 manufacturers (which is enough for proper championship)...
Different conditions at Rally Portugal 2026 but rally fans dont care !
Rally Pictures Thread.