Results 6,271 to 6,280 of 7661
Thread: Rally2 (ex-R5) News
-
16th November 2020, 09:30 #6271Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 1,135
- Like
- 318
- Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
-
16th November 2020, 10:14 #6272Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,504
- Like
- 2,114
- Liked 1,428 Times in 741 Posts
What kind of different fuels can they be mapped for?
And how much does a race fuel add?
Is e85/flexifuel allowed in Rally2?
-
17th November 2020, 00:34 #6273Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 3,093
- Like
- 12
- Liked 431 Times in 251 Posts
Fuel requirements are covered by FIA Appendix J Article 252 Art. 9 on page 6, here:
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/fi...2019.12.04.pdf
- Likes: pantealex (17th November 2020)
-
17th November 2020, 15:56 #6274Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,504
- Like
- 2,114
- Liked 1,428 Times in 741 Posts
How much difference in price per liter is there btw the racefuels and pump price of 98 octan?
-
17th November 2020, 16:12 #6275Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 467
- Like
- 80
- Liked 178 Times in 98 Posts
In here (Portugal), the racefuel cost around 5/6€ per litter. 98 special (ultimate, evologic and so on) goes around 1.70€/l so it's a big difference.
Cannot say for sure, but in our old lancer, the use of 98 oct or race fuel only gave us about 6/7 more bhp and 3% more Nm, however, the engine temperatures were much better with race fuel. We used the Sunoco one that is said to be the better one for that type of cars.
For instance, we tried the ETS for two races, and twice we blown up the turbo on the car, so, even between racing fuels there are differences.
I do believe that for most R5/Rally2 you either use Elf or VP tho.
- Likes: Sulland (17th November 2020)
-
17th November 2020, 16:27 #6276Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Athens
- Posts
- 25,248
- Like
- 10,213
- Liked 16,174 Times in 7,035 Posts
-
17th November 2020, 16:29 #6277Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 467
- Like
- 80
- Liked 178 Times in 98 Posts
-
17th November 2020, 17:28 #6278Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Athens
- Posts
- 25,248
- Like
- 10,213
- Liked 16,174 Times in 7,035 Posts
you have to alter the map properly to see the real advantage of the race fuel.
The gains you saw are almost nothing,probably due to not good altered map.
-
17th November 2020, 19:12 #6279Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 1,135
- Like
- 318
- Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
I think most powerful fuel for R5 now is ETS. Some other are quite close, some other are not much better than 102 pump fuel (but are more stable). If I remember correct difference between Pb98 and proper race fuel was some 7% in case of R5
-
17th November 2020, 21:01 #6280Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,746
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
I have very old (13 years old) dyno measurements from an Evo IX with 100 octane stock fuel (from that time) and 102 octane race fuel, both with the old 32 mm restrictor (gr.N rules from that time). The dyno is from one of the most well known tuners from here who at that time was also doing rallies himself. The graphs give 255 Hp/489 Nm for 100 octane stock fuel and 278 Hp/565 Nm for 102 octane race fuel. Also the torque peak for the race fuel is roughly 200 rpm lower and the power band is a bit wider.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: Sulland (18th November 2020)



Reply With Quote
TGR WRT Customer Racing Our Rally2 test team recently headed to Donegal, Ireland, for four days of development testing on some of rallying's most demanding asphalt roads. With the goal of...
Rally2 (ex-R5) News