Results 1 to 10 of 1296
Thread: WRC future
-
15th November 2019, 10:38 #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- lillehammer
- Posts
- 1,513
- Like
- 1,607
- Liked 816 Times in 389 Posts
WRC future
If Citröen quit, and the 2017 cars are to expensive for privateers, what is the next formula?
An R5+ hybrid?
Maybe thats the resonable economic and sporting formula.
Sent fra min SM-G950F via TapatalkRadioreporter @ www.radiomotor.no
KNA Lillehammer Motorsport
- Likes: tomhlord (6th December 2019)
-
15th November 2019, 11:09 #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,554
- Like
- 7,853
- Liked 11,242 Times in 4,460 Posts
Hybrid is never an economic formula. That's the most complex and complicated option You can choose.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: EstWRC (15th November 2019),pantealex (16th November 2019)
-
15th November 2019, 11:15 #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- lillehammer
- Posts
- 1,513
- Like
- 1,607
- Liked 816 Times in 389 Posts
I think hybrid is part of the next formula, but how economic it is is a different thing.
Maybe put R5 as toppclass, or an R5+, i'll bet Tänak will be spectacular in an R5 too.
Sent fra min SM-G950F via TapatalkRadioreporter @ www.radiomotor.no
KNA Lillehammer Motorsport
-
15th November 2019, 11:18 #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 1,203
- Like
- 528
- Liked 747 Times in 381 Posts
-
15th November 2019, 11:22 #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,554
- Like
- 7,853
- Liked 11,242 Times in 4,460 Posts
Hybrid is a politically and socially motivated option, not economically in terms of championship cost.
However the thing is that the manufacturers are willing to pay more for this politically motivated option, which tells You that the money is there. I don't think that in terms of the championship expenses we can talk simply in money figures. The motivations in the marketing activities are not purely financial and so are not the benefits.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: AnttiL (31st October 2020)
-
15th November 2019, 11:51 #6
-
15th November 2019, 13:03 #7
- Likes: T16 (15th November 2019)
-
15th November 2019, 13:52 #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 1,203
- Like
- 528
- Liked 747 Times in 381 Posts
-
15th November 2019, 13:55 #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,004
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
That’s insane…it would almost double current cars price. What about Matton’s plan to get low budget hybrids? TOCA/Cosworth mild system costs only 20k per season: https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/m...logy-btcc-2022
Rally addict since 1982
-
15th November 2019, 14:03 #10
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,554
- Like
- 7,853
- Liked 11,242 Times in 4,460 Posts
Figures, figures, still figures flying in the air. What they tell to you? Of course you can imagine that it's one hell of a money for anyone of us but we are not the manufacturers.
The manufacturers are involved in the process of rules creation. They know what they want and how much they are willing to invest. The hybrid WRC will be more expensive. That's no-brainer. However from the very simple fact that the manufacturers are pushing for that you can easily deduce that the money is not the problem if it's spent on something they are actually interested in.
I say let it happen. If they want it they can have it. Nobody else except the manufacturers is going to use these cars anyway so it will not affect the other classes and it will keep the sport running.Last edited by Mirek; 15th November 2019 at 14:06.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: tommeke_B (15th November 2019)
Great speeds. Did you miss WRC machinery on these roads?
[ERC] Royal Rally of Scandinavia...