Page 507 of 766 FirstFirst ... 7407457497505506507508509517557607 ... LastLast
Results 5,061 to 5,070 of 7660
  1. #5061
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,586
    Like
    1,913
    Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rally Power View Post
    In the 2L WRC era, top rally cars had clear size variations but were, mostly, equally competitive (Impreza/206, Lancer/Corolla,…).

    Probably, Skoda main advantage comes from having R5 as their main motorsport program; besides the standard costumer program, they compete with the Fabia as a works team, which hugely helps to boost the car development.

    Btw, the next Fabia will use the current Polo platform.

    PS: nice start of the C3; lets hope it'll be more successfull than the DS.
    Those differences in dimensions were not that big actually. I remember the wheelbase of the Impreza WRC had a wheelbase of +-5cm longer than the 206 WRC. The differences in appearance/looks of the cars were bigger than they are now, for sure...

  2. #5062
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,909
    Like
    2,178
    Liked 2,265 Times in 1,217 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rally Power View Post
    Btw, the next Fabia will use the current Polo platform.
    That doesn't necessarily mean it will have the same dimensions. New VAG platform architecture is much more variable (and even before this MQB architecture many Skoda models actually used different wheelbases to similar VW counterparts)

    However Skoda tend to major on interior space so it's a good bet the next generation Fabia will have a longer wheelbase.

  3. #5063
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,746
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Most likely Fabia IV will have same wheelbase as Polo/Ibiza, i.e. reasonably larger than current R5 car.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  4. #5064
    Senior Member Rally Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,003
    Like
    3,729
    Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tommeke_B View Post
    Those differences in dimensions were not that big actually. I remember the wheelbase of the Impreza WRC had a wheelbase of +-5cm longer than the 206 WRC. The differences in appearance/looks of the cars were bigger than they are now, for sure...
    Quick check on Martin Holmes yearbooks: the 206 WB measured 2,468m, 4,2cm less than the Evo VI, 13,2cm less than the Evo VII, 5,2 cm less than any Impreza GD, 8,7cm less than the Xsara or less 14,7cm than the Focus MkI. The Corolla WB was 3cm shorter than the 206.

    Instead of a max length, at the time there was a mandatory minimal 4m overall length; only Peugeot (and later Skoda) choose a B segment car, all the others used C cars. If a shorter WB was so vital, for sure other manus would easily, like Peugeot, sort a limited series of their B models with larger bumpers in order to pass the 4m.


    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    That doesn't necessarily mean it will have the same dimensions.
    True. Still the only B cars already using the new platform (Ibiza and Polo) have the same WB (2,564m).
    Rally addict since 1982

  5. #5065
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,746
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rally Power View Post
    Quick check on Martin Holmes yearbooks: the 206 WB measured 2,468m, 4,2cm less than the Evo VI, 13,2cm less than the Evo VII, 5,2 cm less than any Impreza GD, 8,7cm less than the Xsara or less 14,7cm than the Focus MkI. The Corolla WB was 3cm shorter than the 206.
    Different times, different technical rules (all active cars before 2006 for example), very different tyres and suspension and very different conditions for design optimization through simulations. I would say that today it's less about personal inventions of the designers and more about very systematic work.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  6. #5066
    Senior Member Andre Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,034
    Like
    1,619
    Liked 5,805 Times in 2,443 Posts
    According rallye-magazin.de Polo GTI R5 will not be homologated in August. So, debut should be in Catalunya.

  7. #5067
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,504
    Like
    2,112
    Liked 1,428 Times in 741 Posts
    So will all R5s have a version of this document, where the last joker it has installed is noted?
    So are manufacturers and firms approved to install jokers issuing them?
    Just so byuers know what to ask the seller to show as proof.

    https://www.rfeda.es/documents/20185/734626/RD%20ASFALTO%202017%20Anexo%2012%20Declaraci%C3%B3 n%20Jokers%20Veh%C3%ADculos%20Gr%20R5

  8. #5068
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,746
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    It looks like it's nothing more than a declaration of what is installed in the particular car to be signed by the team during scrutineering.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  9. #5069
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,135
    Like
    318
    Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
    Quite similar list you need to fill on every WRC/ERC event when you start with R5 car, they update it then in their system and control. Next rally you can't start with older spec than it's noted in gold book.
    That Spanish list is nice, but not actual.

  10. Likes: pantealex (19th April 2018),Sulland (19th April 2018),TWRC (19th April 2018)
  11. #5070
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,504
    Like
    2,112
    Liked 1,428 Times in 741 Posts
    Looks like VW will delay homologation, they will not have time to reach timelines to get it ready for August 1.
    This according to Sven Smets talking to Rallye Magazine. They need more testing to be certain it is good enough on both surfaces.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •