Results 1,181 to 1,190 of 2630
-
12th April 2017, 14:45 #1181
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Posts
- 47
- Like
- 0
- Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
It is probable that they are using the same car (chassis) from the begining of the season, but the material is replaced between the rallyes, for sure. So, the problems are not related with that kind of wearing issue that you point.
-
13th April 2017, 14:01 #1182
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 5,319
- Like
- 543
- Liked 2,263 Times in 894 Posts
Have to say I completely agree with Penasse here around manufacturer points:
http://www.rallysportmag.com.au/home...rs-in-2017-wrc
Still score points with two but don't allow drivers to take points they didn't earn.RS Motorsport Media - Follow me on Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia
- Likes: focus206 (13th April 2017),Sulland (13th April 2017)
-
13th April 2017, 15:00 #1183
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 2,051
- Like
- 581
- Liked 949 Times in 450 Posts
-
13th April 2017, 18:53 #1184
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 3,275
- Like
- 674
- Liked 276 Times in 183 Posts
I agree as well!
Post your own splits on the net: find RallyStopwatch on the Google Play Store.
Follow posted splits on twitter with #RallySplits hashtag.
-
13th April 2017, 22:03 #1185
Well, having 3rd car playing role is not that bad. It adds additional level of competition. I don't see it as unfair.
-
14th April 2017, 01:40 #1186
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 3,301
- Like
- 2,598
- Liked 2,299 Times in 1,080 Posts
I actually disagree, I like it the way it is
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
-
14th April 2017, 08:14 #1187
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Bellagio
- Posts
- 2,190
- Like
- 24
- Liked 167 Times in 69 Posts
-
14th April 2017, 08:56 #1188
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 1,561
- Like
- 5
- Liked 945 Times in 513 Posts
I on the contrary, also agree with Penasse and can`t see any nonsense. TDC for example...Paddon finished the whole event and didn`t score points (I`m ok with that two car rule, so Neuville and Sordo took the points) but rally2 driver Tänak finished 11th, but took 6th place points. For what? IMHO 7th place (7th best RC1 car) would have been more honest.
-
14th April 2017, 09:00 #1189
I would like to correct my statement, because I misunderstand the article. I think blocking the points is more fair, and it does add additional level of competition. Not only that, I think WRC2 cars should also block points, because with 10 WRC cars on average, they will score points even after restartin next day after retirement.
- Likes: HaCo (14th April 2017)
-
14th April 2017, 09:30 #1190
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 3,762
- Like
- 474
- Liked 1,810 Times in 428 Posts
It was like now in the past, I do not see any reason for changes. We do not change all the things all the time when something is not as we like. World is unfair to someone anyway. Next they find some other things unfair? I like when the things are stable. Keep the rules as they are, it is nice competition right now. No need to add extra confusion and changes. Rules are the same for everyone. At the end of the day, one loses in one event other loses in other event. DO NOT TOUCH THE RULES!
Colins Crest = Möldri Mätas
- Likes: Andre Oliveira (14th April 2017)
I think that M-Sport would do just fine if not the best, if there would be no manufacturer direct involvement. As mentioned. Manufacturer would provide a car, tuner would build the racing beast, and...
WRC mainclass from 2027