Results 151 to 160 of 2630
-
11th January 2017, 18:58 #151
- Likes: pantealex (11th January 2017),TWRC (11th January 2017)
-
11th January 2017, 20:58 #152
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Posts
- 912
- Like
- 405
- Liked 500 Times in 256 Posts
-
11th January 2017, 21:31 #153
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,003
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
Why blame the FIA for being supportive to the most important players of the sport, the manus? Besides, today a rules exception comes handy to VW, tomorrow it can be useful to any other make, like it happened several times in the past.
The Mini WRC case was one of those times. BMW was authorized to homologate the new car in 2011 even if Prodrive only planned to rally a limited number of events during the season. They didn’t score points and were obliged to enter a full season on ’12, otherwise the Mini homologation would be cancelled (eventually after Prodrive pull out a plan B using Araujo’s private team come in rescue of BMW and all Mini’s WRC owners).
It would be great to see the ’17 Polo rallying, but maybe it just won’t happen. For now it’s quite clear that VW’s board decision to pull out WRC was rush and probably not unanimous. Otherwise we wouldn’t be seeing a couple of members of the board alongside VW Motorsport top staff trying to sort out a solution to put the car on stages. Best luck for them!Rally addict since 1982
- Likes: WUff1 (12th January 2017)
-
12th January 2017, 08:41 #154
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 88
- Like
- 0
- Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
As I understand, it's not a question of homologation dates. The bureaucratic process concerning the car was finished in time. But there is no homologation without the manufacturer formally entering into WRC. That date has passed an that's the point, VW needs to sort out and needs the agreement from the other manus: How to realise an entry without Volkswagen doing it?
-
12th January 2017, 09:29 #155
- Likes: A FONDO (12th January 2017),aykutbilir (12th January 2017),EstWRC (12th January 2017)
-
12th January 2017, 09:31 #156
- Join Date
- Nov 2014
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 14,938
- Like
- 6,966
- Liked 12,561 Times in 5,447 Posts
Looks good. Didn't like it at first but looks better here. Doesnt look so messy anymore.
#8 Ott Tänak - Martin Järveoja #8
- World Rally Champions 2019 -
-
12th January 2017, 09:33 #157
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,748
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
I don't like the livery at all but that's same case for me with nearly all RedBull ones.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: EstWRC (12th January 2017)
-
12th January 2017, 09:48 #158
- Likes: A FONDO (12th January 2017),aykutbilir (12th January 2017)
-
12th January 2017, 09:48 #159
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 3,586
- Like
- 1,913
- Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
Looks like a DTM car now, not just the car but also the livery. These cars could look very strange on gravel or snow setup.
-
12th January 2017, 10:29 #160
- Join Date
- Nov 2014
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 14,938
- Like
- 6,966
- Liked 12,561 Times in 5,447 Posts
More angles of ogier car https://twitter.com/rallyinguk/statu...90598696734721
#8 Ott Tänak - Martin Järveoja #8
- World Rally Champions 2019 -
- Likes: A FONDO (12th January 2017)
I think that M-Sport would do just fine if not the best, if there would be no manufacturer direct involvement. As mentioned. Manufacturer would provide a car, tuner would build the racing beast, and...
WRC mainclass from 2027