Results 671 to 680 of 683
Thread: Deutschland rally 2016
-
31st August 2016, 19:24 #671
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 1,891
- Like
- 144
- Liked 1,104 Times in 498 Posts
Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.
-
31st August 2016, 19:42 #672
- Likes: Mintexmemory (31st August 2016)
-
31st August 2016, 19:53 #673
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 1,540
- Like
- 368
- Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
safety to some - danger to another
tank stopper - car killer >>> https://youtu.be/9GVZPQpTVJ8
-
1st September 2016, 00:04 #674
-
1st September 2016, 00:29 #675
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Posts
- 20,522
- Like
- 439
- Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
-
2nd September 2016, 21:18 #676
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Posts
- 26
- Like
- 38
- Liked 33 Times in 15 Posts
A small onboard video from Suarez.
Nice onboard cam.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BJ3bkiwhA8F/
Στλθηκε απ το LG-D802 μου χρησιμοποιντας Tapatalk
-
3rd September 2016, 11:24 #677
All this hp vs safety debate is ignoring the fact that the increase in power is expected around 20%. That will not result in a 20% speed increase...
The place where Lefebvre crashed they are probably going to do 175 km/h rather than 165 km/h... If even that because they will likely have to brake/lift before the corner next year.
We won't see cars go insane speeds next year... Probably maximum 10% increase at the end of the straights.
Roll cage safety has massively increased since the day of group b, we have flexible fuel tanks, strengthening triangles everywhere, hans devices, six point harnesses (or 5, can't remember right now). The biggest issue is impact from the sides still, like what Michael Park died from... And that's an issue regardless of speed. If you go sideways into a tree with your road car at 70 you are likely to get killed too.
The slight increase in power and control in corners is not the difference between life and death in a crash.
Putting tires on the Hinkelsteins is not going to help either as that would just act as a ramp to propel the car into the forest.
What they should do is look at good natural ways to keep the speed down in dangerous high speed areas. Not another hay bale chicane but some neater solution.
- Likes: Fast Eddie WRC (3rd September 2016)
-
3rd September 2016, 20:19 #678
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,748
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
4th September 2016, 14:36 #679
The severity of a crash is determined by how fast the object at speed (driver and car) is halted, and we are not talking a 50% speed increase in the corners here. Probably maximum 10% if even that. Wk=mv˛/ 2 gives an increase in kinetic energy of 21% if the increased speed is 10%. This is not what determine life or death in a crash situation.
Also with R2-power and WRC safety you could kill someone in a sideways impact in finland towards a tree... or say that the same car in a high speed event hits a rock on the inside of the corner and it throws the car on it's side into a tree, just so that it hits the windshield.
I can guarantee that will be bye bye both driver and codriver considering how much damage there was to that area of Camili's car in Monte this year from a relatively low speed impact.
The increased speed is not what will make or break the safety situation.
-
4th September 2016, 14:47 #680
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 3,586
- Like
- 1,913
- Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
Actually for side-impact the cars will be safer. According to Sven Smeets (in an interview with autonews magazine), inside the new cars there's more space between the seats of the drivers and the doors.
It seems that rumors are getting stronger that Yuki will be gone at the end of the year. The way that second seat eats up drivers it wouldn't shock me.
2025 Silly Season