Page 68 of 69 FirstFirst ... 185866676869 LastLast
Results 671 to 680 of 683
  1. #671
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,891
    Like
    144
    Liked 1,104 Times in 498 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rally Power View Post
    The tractors in Finland were a totally different matter and the perfect illustration of a brainless rally innovation: chicanes are supposed to make stages safer, not more dangerous.
    I'll use a different analogy then. You wouldn't mind hitting a very young tree (minimal damage to the car), if there was a chance you could go faster at that turn. But would you have the same approach to the corner if that tree was much older and stronger?
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  2. #672
    Senior Member Rally Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,003
    Like
    3,729
    Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    And Valtra did put some amount of money in the event. So ... ?
    …no matters what, it still was an avoidable risk!

    Btw, what could be next?...



    Rally addict since 1982

  3. Likes: Mintexmemory (31st August 2016)
  4. #673
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,540
    Like
    368
    Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
    safety to some - danger to another

    tank stopper - car killer >>> https://youtu.be/9GVZPQpTVJ8


  5. #674
    Senior Member Mintexmemory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,051
    Like
    579
    Liked 803 Times in 438 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    It's sooooo I don't know what to try and counter any non-competitor when THEY start getting not just interested but in a lather about anything conceivably related to the general idea of safety!!!!!!

    I spent a couple decades not slamming some poncy cars with incredible cages into things---I was busy slamming my body into things....Odd thing is that I was never asked if I needed warning not to hit all the various BIG rocks or rock walls or big trees sometimes just quite literally 3-4 inches away from the handle bars or footpegs...

    I have this vision of the Safety Screamers thinking perhaps we should walk slowly thru every meter of every SS and somebody---and a priest with some boys with the smoking urns following saying " (Mumble mumble, some indistinct Latin) "Protect us from THIS rock---don't hit it...." "Protect us from THIS rock---don't hit it...." "Protect us from THIS rock---don't hit it...." "Protect us from THIS rock---don't hit it...." "Protect us from THIS tree---don't hit it...."
    "Protect us from THIS house---don't hit it...."
    "Protect us from THIS rock---don't hit it...."

    Some crazy slow procession of the sinners..

    I wish maybe somebody would have maybe occasionally reminded by not to hit the ground so often--especially with my poor head.

    But oddly, once I started doing Stage rally, without anybody ever mentioning it, I never hit any of the huge trucks or road graders or water trucks or other big nasty bright yellow equipment the logging companies around here leave out in the woods...And oddly I didn't hit other cars on transits, or trees or houses either...

    Without any special warning..
    I wonder if I'm a genius or

    maybe warnings and worry at some point are absurdities...because they are so fawkin obvious to anybody actually doing this sport IF they have an few ounces of brains.


    (I did hit the ground with the roof a couple of times, still working on that)
    Constant blows to the head? mmmm... that explains a lot!
    Kris Meeke got fired -PSG so terrified they quit!

  6. #675
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by danon View Post
    safety to some - danger to another

    tank stopper - car killer >>> https://youtu.be/9GVZPQpTVJ8

    And the darwin award goes to...

    Of course i would not expect better from a person that visits a WRC event to take "pro" artistic pictures of hairpins.

    Useless masterless dogs with no use to society

  7. #676
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26
    Like
    38
    Liked 33 Times in 15 Posts
    A small onboard video from Suarez.
    Nice onboard cam.


    https://www.instagram.com/p/BJ3bkiwhA8F/

    Στλθηκε απ το LG-D802 μου χρησιμοποιντας Tapatalk

  8. #677
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 778 Times in 419 Posts
    All this hp vs safety debate is ignoring the fact that the increase in power is expected around 20%. That will not result in a 20% speed increase...

    The place where Lefebvre crashed they are probably going to do 175 km/h rather than 165 km/h... If even that because they will likely have to brake/lift before the corner next year.

    We won't see cars go insane speeds next year... Probably maximum 10% increase at the end of the straights.

    Roll cage safety has massively increased since the day of group b, we have flexible fuel tanks, strengthening triangles everywhere, hans devices, six point harnesses (or 5, can't remember right now). The biggest issue is impact from the sides still, like what Michael Park died from... And that's an issue regardless of speed. If you go sideways into a tree with your road car at 70 you are likely to get killed too.

    The slight increase in power and control in corners is not the difference between life and death in a crash.

    Putting tires on the Hinkelsteins is not going to help either as that would just act as a ramp to propel the car into the forest.

    What they should do is look at good natural ways to keep the speed down in dangerous high speed areas. Not another hay bale chicane but some neater solution.

  9. Likes: Fast Eddie WRC (3rd September 2016)
  10. #678
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
    All this hp vs safety debate is ignoring the fact that the increase in power is expected around 20%. That will not result in a 20% speed increase...

    The place where Lefebvre crashed they are probably going to do 175 km/h rather than 165 km/h... If even that because they will likely have to brake/lift before the corner next year.

    We won't see cars go insane speeds next year... Probably maximum 10% increase at the end of the straights.
    They won't go much faster on straights (also thanks to higher drag). They will go reasonably faster through corners. That is obviously more important for crash situation that the speed on straights which isn't that important in my opinion.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  11. #679
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 778 Times in 419 Posts
    The severity of a crash is determined by how fast the object at speed (driver and car) is halted, and we are not talking a 50% speed increase in the corners here. Probably maximum 10% if even that. Wk=mv˛/ 2 gives an increase in kinetic energy of 21% if the increased speed is 10%. This is not what determine life or death in a crash situation.

    Also with R2-power and WRC safety you could kill someone in a sideways impact in finland towards a tree... or say that the same car in a high speed event hits a rock on the inside of the corner and it throws the car on it's side into a tree, just so that it hits the windshield.
    I can guarantee that will be bye bye both driver and codriver considering how much damage there was to that area of Camili's car in Monte this year from a relatively low speed impact.

    The increased speed is not what will make or break the safety situation.

  12. #680
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,586
    Like
    1,913
    Liked 3,476 Times in 1,016 Posts
    Actually for side-impact the cars will be safer. According to Sven Smeets (in an interview with autonews magazine), inside the new cars there's more space between the seats of the drivers and the doors.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •