WRC Testing

[seb_sh]

Depping today
https://youtu.be/GK5yJZlPlQo

nice video. not sure if it's because of the rough surface but the car didn't look as boring on tarmac as some of us are expecting.

[rallysupportnl]

VIDEO: Tarmac Test Volkswagen Polo R WRC 2017!



Click on the photo or here --> https://youtu.be/T6AT0XzkJfE

[dimviii]

nice video. not sure if it's because of the rough surface but the car didn't look as boring on tarmac as some of us are expecting.

seems its very slippery the surface.

[EstWRC]

Sordo is back https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfQ6...ature=youtu.be

[stefanvv]

nice video. not sure if it's because of the rough surface but the car didn't look as boring on tarmac as some of us are expecting.

How could a faster car be boring?

[Mirek]

Of course it can and very often it is. There are countless examples.

For example stock Evo IX is faster than Quattro S1. Which one do You prefer to watch?

[stefanvv]

You seem to compare cars with 20 years difference, what is the point? And who said Evo is boring?

[Mirek]

You seem to compare cars with 20 years difference, what is the point?

That one is more boring while being faster. Isn't that exactly what You wrote?

And who said Evo is boring?

Do You prefer stock Evo over S1?

[cali]

You seem to compare cars with 20 years difference, what is the point? And who said Evo is boring?

Evo's are boring to watch. Period.
Only few chosen ones can drive evo's flamboyant and fast.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk

[stefanvv]

That one is more boring while being faster. Isn't that exactly what You wrote?



Do You prefer stock Evo over S1?

I don't get Your point of '17 vs '16 rules. Of course I prefer S1, but it is with its time. In Evo IX times there could be much better than S1, but this is irrelevant.