-
21st March 2016, 15:39 #7731
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Athens
- Posts
- 25,107
- Like
- 9,945
- Liked 16,104 Times in 6,991 Posts
the restricted 911 has more power from evo N+ and weight less.Uses wider tyres also.So driving at dry abrasive asphalt IS a reason.
agree.
agree if you mean the unrestricted 911s.
agree again.
they had superiority at power,and that wasnt fair for any r5 driver who had championship hopes. As you saw,even when restricted them,but still higher than r5 bhp,most of them didnt want to continue to drive.Lost the advantage,and that was the reason they choosed these cars.
nevermind they can choose N+ with less money too and be very competetive with r5 cars as we saw from Garcia,so even this excuse finished.
They had choosed them from their power advantage.Lets see when Vallejos drive r5 cars if they will get 5 wins so easy.
-
21st March 2016, 15:45 #7732
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Athens
- Posts
- 25,107
- Like
- 9,945
- Liked 16,104 Times in 6,991 Posts
-
21st March 2016, 16:07 #7733
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,841
- Like
- 2
- Liked 629 Times in 347 Posts
Now you are talking rubbish - how can you compare 2009 spec Fiesta S2000 with TOP Fabia S2000 with the latest improvements??? And not even think about how well was Mundl's Fabia maintained compared to Neubauer's Fiesta??
Just the class was the same, but here the similarities ends....
- Likes: WRC1 (21st March 2016),WUff1 (21st March 2016)
-
21st March 2016, 16:24 #7734
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Sleezattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 3,342
- Like
- 737
- Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
Same way as those of us who read both WRC and national results when held same time saw Mats Jonsson in 1997 spec WRC Cosworth doing times equal to 4ths and 5ths and 6th current WRC drivers brand new WRC cars...
13 years old spec...which is like from last Ice-age....
The spec of the cars is highly exaggerated..especially by those who don't compete or who buy their rides.John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle WA, USA
Vive le Prole-le-ralliat
-
21st March 2016, 16:44 #7735
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,526
- Like
- 7,836
- Liked 11,190 Times in 4,441 Posts
If he has money to run modern WRC why wasn't he able to find money to run proper S2000? It's cheaper, You know. Still the point stays - why is it good to change rules just because Neubauer and Grössing feel frustrated from not being able to beat an old man? The bright side of that is that ÖRM found finally someone to do so while Baumschlager is still alive.
By the way Neubauer was born in 1988, Baumschlager in 1959. He may be older than Neubauer's father.
PS Do You believe that introducing very expensive cars has in any way helped the true Austrian talents who sit at home? I mean guys like Andreas Aigner or Beppo Harrach...Last edited by Mirek; 21st March 2016 at 16:48.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: Jarek Z (22nd March 2016),PLuto (22nd March 2016),tc10a (21st March 2016),TWRC (21st March 2016)
-
21st March 2016, 20:17 #7736
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- near Vienna, Austria
- Posts
- 1,338
- Like
- 2,734
- Liked 352 Times in 184 Posts
Future of Austrian rallying is not Aigner nor Harrach, but bloody young guys like brothers Simon & Julian Wagner, Christoph Zellhofer and Luca Waldherr.
If Harrach would really like to, I´m sure he could drive, his family is very wealthy. With Aigner it´s a bad situation, his crowdfunding campaign, which others use now successfully, unfortunately failed
Biggest winner is Austrian rallying now, even media interest rose again, and it´s exciting again to watch or follow the rallies.
- Likes: WRC1 (21st March 2016)
-
21st March 2016, 21:17 #7737
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 1,841
- Like
- 2
- Liked 629 Times in 347 Posts
1. Neubauer is not giving mony, he drives for team, which has own sponsor. If they didn't have money for a top S2000/R5 in previous years, we can not blaim them. They were there, with old technology without any real chance against work-Fabia with a highly experiencend driver. Now they secured budget for WRC, thanks god for this brave step....
2. Some of you are quickly forgetting.....because of whom were changed fuel rules in the middle of season?? We all know this pearson or better said the team....the result was Neubauer left the championship....
3. As already other forum member mentioned-the championship is again interesting.
4. Baumschlager stressed on many occasions, that he was not driving on the limit. There was no need. Now the role is changed, the old fox is forced to step on the throttle. And if, I repeat if he loses the championship crown, no tragedy....
- Likes: WRC1 (21st March 2016),WUff1 (22nd March 2016)
-
21st March 2016, 21:42 #7738
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,526
- Like
- 7,836
- Liked 11,190 Times in 4,441 Posts
What is brave about buying better car than Your opponent when You know that he can not buy similar one? Tell me please.
The rule was simply stupid and was changed for good. And no, it wasn't because of Fabia not "eating" stock fuel. Fabia has factory mapping for several types of stock fuel, even for 98 octane.
Maybe, but in my opinion making a championship interesting by making it unfair is completely wrong.
What a comment. So because others were not able to make pressure on Baumschlager under same rules we allow them to use better car because we know that Baumschlager has some contract with factory and can't switch the car as well? How stupid thinking is that?
---
You are right that it doesn't matter if Baumschlager has N titles or N+1 but what matters is if there is someone who can succeed him. Those who need WRC to beat him are not such for sure.
The change of rules towards WRC was same mistake as here in CZ and done in completely wrong time when nearly all other championships switch into all R5/S2000 rules and as a result see an incredible rise of their national competition level (Britain, Belgium, Italy, Portugal for example).Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: Jarek Z (22nd March 2016),PLuto (22nd March 2016),tc10a (21st March 2016)
-
21st March 2016, 22:54 #7739
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Posts
- 548
- Like
- 95
- Liked 359 Times in 175 Posts
Completely agree. All the top contenders in top-spec R5 cars would give a much better competiton and would maybe attract also some of the mentioned guys, which have now no seat.
But Neubauer and Grössing would probably have again no chance against Baumschlager over the season.
They need the WRCs. Some Austrian newspapers even already try to suggest that Baumschlager has no disadvantage because of his R5 car...
- Likes: Jarek Z (22nd March 2016),PLuto (22nd March 2016)
-
22nd March 2016, 07:15 #7740
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- near Vienna, Austria
- Posts
- 1,338
- Like
- 2,734
- Liked 352 Times in 184 Posts
You forget that these countries always were big rally nations, with a good structure and a big fanbase. Austria is not anymore, at least at the moment, In former years or better said decades it was different.
I´m sure WRC will be forbidden again in Austria after some time, and Neubauer´s team also thought about buying a new R5 car instead of the WRC, so this is what will happen then. And then I´m sure Neubauer will still be able to fight against Baumschlager. He even was with his very old Fiesta S2000 in 2014, a car which was described by some of you guys as not being in good shape at Barum Rally 2015.
- Likes: WRC1 (22nd March 2016)
Didn't WEC has quite nice revival last few years? It's not exactly friendly series for short spam attention. This factor seems overexaggerated. For me, whether it's rally1 or rally2 is not as...
WRC main class in 2025