Results 1 to 10 of 78

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,774
    Like
    23
    Liked 838 Times in 692 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by veeten View Post
    Then again, if Honda is forced to fulfill the contract with FIA/FOM , Red Bull could make it even harder by providing a better chassis for their powertrain.

    This could cause some severe consternation for Ron, as they wouldn't have Honda to blame for their predicament, and reveal what a total DOG the chassis is.

    Reasons as to why, and food for thought...
    There is no guarantee that Redbull chassis would be better than the Mclaren chassis. Especially when Newey is not responsible for the aero package anymore. If anything, Redbull may need to make adjustments to fit the Honda engine into their chassis which may push the advantage to Mclaren that has already built a chassis from scratch specifically for the Honda engine.

    I can see why Mclaren would push back on Redbull having the Honda engine. Mclaren has put in a year of working with Honda to get that engine where it is so far, a year of embarrassment and test of character and Redbull simply wants to swooping in and take benefit of the work done by Mclaren. The question really is, if they think they could work with Honda to further develop the Honda engine, why are they not doing the same with Renault. Why would working with Honda and their slower engine be any different to working with Renault. The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence l suppose.
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 4th November 2015 at 09:36.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •