2015 Japanese Grand Prix

[steveaki13]

I think everyone knows that Alonso is very emotional and passionate and that will sometimes overspill and lead to this. Even though its probably not right, it is also not a surprise to me.

[Nitrodaze]

I think Alonso should have been a little bit sensitive to amount of support given to the Mclaren team by the Japanese fans. That said, it was obviously very difficult and frustrating to not be in a position to give these fans a positive race. But this is Alonso we love, he tells you like it is. He is a relentless racer, a winner and a world champion, he can be forgiven for his lapse of sensitivity on this occassion.

[zako85]

The camera focus on the battle for 12th position in the remaining 10-15 laps showed that racing can be interesting even with predictable race winners.

Also, with both Red Bulls having a poor start, as well as Massa, it was interesting to observe which of the midfield teams would capitalize on this situation. Force India, Lotus, and STR should be heading home pretty satisfied. Lotus did very well for its current financial situation, with 7-8 double-points finish. The Toro Rossos did pretty fine by scooping up the remaining points positions 9 and 10. Niko Hulkenberg did incredibly well, by finishing 6th after starting 13th in the gird.

[Nitrodaze]

The camera focus on the battle for 12th position in the remaining 10-15 laps showed that racing can be interesting even with predictable race winners.

I have to say, the televising of the Suzuka race wasn't great. The producer did not give the full spread of the grid an even coverage. We missed a lot of relevant actions, like Kimi getting into 4th, Hulkenberg reaching 6th or the Lotus pair securing top ten possitions for example. The coverage spent a lot of time on the actions outside the top ten and missed a lot of the action within the top ten. The top ten teams missed out on air time for their sponsors as a result.
The race appeared boring because the coverage was too narrow, thus made it appear boring.

[Nitrodaze]

On commentating, l have to compliment the pairing of Edwards and Coultard. Their commentating has been quite enjoyable and exemplary. The best pairing the BBC has put forward since Murray Walker and Martin Brundle. I am finding Coultard in particular most refreshing. He has become quite objective in his commentary and refreshingly candid with his frank but honest opinions. And Jordan is alway entertaining to behold. Suzi anchors the whole event in a manner that simply surpasses any of her predecessors. The BBC F1 team in general have made the limited coverage of F1 in recent times more bearable with their exemplary performance. Bravo guys, thumbs up from me.

[AndyL]

I have to say, the televising of the Suzuka race wasn't great. The producer did not give the full spread of the grid an even coverage. We missed a lot of relevant actions, like Kimi getting into 4th, Hulkenberg reaching 6th or the Lotus pair securing top ten possitions for example. The coverage spent a lot of time on the actions outside the top ten and missed a lot of the action within the top ten. The top ten teams missed out on air time for their sponsors as a result.
The race appeared boring because the coverage was too narrow, thus made it appear boring.

Martin Brundle suggested that Mercedes weren't getting any TV coverage as punishment for refusing to supply engines to Red Bull. He was joking - I think...

[dj_bytedisaster]

Martin Brundle suggested that Mercedes weren't getting any TV coverage as punishment for refusing to supply engines to Red Bull. He was joking - I think...

Not quite. Bernie's arse is up against the wall. If nobody gives RB engines, he loses two teams. With Lotus still in limbo, it could very well be three. It's not the first time he's used TV blackballing as a 'negotiation tool'.

[Bagwan]

On that "forceful" move by Hamilton , he said :
“I didn’t feel it was particularly that close. The inside line is the inside line so it was my corner. We were very close – I was understeering, running out of grip. I imagine Nico ran out of road but that is what happens when you’re on the outside.”

So , it wasn't that close , but they were very close ?
What ?

Nervous answer , where he admits he understeered into Nico's path , forcing him off the track , because he had the right to do so , being that he was on the inside .

And , Nico says he had to run wide to avoid an accident , which was a very measured response .

This is exactly the same situation that had Nico angry enough last year to hold his ground and be a part of an accident .

And Hamilton knows it .
He had acres of space to his right , and pushed his team mate off .

There is no doubt in my mind that had they been on different teams , there would have been a protest of the move .

[rjbetty]

On that "forceful" move by Hamilton , he said :
“I didn’t feel it was particularly that close. The inside line is the inside line so it was my corner. We were very close – I was understeering, running out of grip. I imagine Nico ran out of road but that is what happens when you’re on the outside.”

So , it wasn't that close , but they were very close ?
What ?

Nervous answer , where he admits he understeered into Nico's path , forcing him off the track , because he had the right to do so , being that he was on the inside .

And , Nico says he had to run wide to avoid an accident , which was a very measured response .

This is exactly the same situation that had Nico angry enough last year to hold his ground and be a part of an accident .

And Hamilton knows it .
He had acres of space to his right , and pushed his team mate off .

There is no doubt in my mind that had they been on different teams , there would have been a protest of the move .

Oh shut up

[Big Ben]

On that "forceful" move by Hamilton , he said :
“I didn’t feel it was particularly that close. The inside line is the inside line so it was my corner. We were very close – I was understeering, running out of grip. I imagine Nico ran out of road but that is what happens when you’re on the outside.”

So , it wasn't that close , but they were very close ?
What ?

He's not the sharpest tool in the shed, but a tool nevertheless.