Thread: The new FIA WRC-car concept 2017
-
16th August 2015, 23:52 #161Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 1,540
- Like
- 368
- Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
-
16th August 2015, 23:52 #162Objective observer
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Wonderlamd
- Posts
- 6,715
- Like
- 1,558
- Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
no they were fine so far for wrc2017 & Pikes Peak, the last ones I didn't get what they're for....
"With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI
-
16th August 2015, 23:58 #163Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 1,540
- Like
- 368
- Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
for a change
-
17th August 2015, 00:09 #164
-
17th August 2015, 00:26 #165
-
17th August 2015, 01:41 #166Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Halifax, UK
- Posts
- 531
- Like
- 169
- Liked 140 Times in 86 Posts
-
17th August 2015, 05:31 #167
The Audi TT should have a short enough wheelbase to work.
Why wouldn't they homologate that? What's the drawback? It seems inherently aerodynamic (to a layman who doesn't know shit about aerodynamics).
I get that Audi probably won't return while vw is in the championship but it sounds realistic to me.
-
17th August 2015, 07:38 #168Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
WRC regs basically mean that most of the field has a wheelbase of 2,480mm and a width of 1,820mm.
The TT which sits on the MQB platform; which is also what the Audi A3, VW Golf and Skoda Octavia sit on, has a wheelbase of 2,505mm and a width of 1,832mm.
Audi could very easily homologate the TT if they wanted to but I suspect that an Audi rally car is more likely to be either an A3 or an A1 so that they can exploit the Quattro heritage. Besides which, Audi is already playing in sports cars and the DTM. The group is already doing fine.The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
-
17th August 2015, 09:25 #169
Sure, but in '17 they'll be wider so they should be able to fit it to the regs. I get that it is difficult to make that kind of car competitive in rally... or at least that's how it seems to me. I remember reading somewhere that the Celica was very difficult to build to be competitive and that to stay ahead they basically had to resort to the infamous cheat when the restrictors were introduced as they previously had kept ahead via superior engine power. IIRC it had something to do with the rigidity of the body shell or something like that. Correct me if I am wrong.
I thought they had a TT quattro already? Maybe I am wrong... they would certainly have gained fans and following if they did since it would be something different. I genuinely expected Toyota to run the GT-86 rather than the Yaris upon their return for that very reason!
-
17th August 2015, 10:34 #170Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,748
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
Guys, don't try to search for more complicated reasons than they actually are. They use Polo because of marketing. All others use B-segment cars and that's why they do so as well.
Yes, that's exactly the point. There is nothing in the regulations which would forbid them from using TT or Veloster or whatever for WRC. It's just their own decision to use Polo or i20.Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: pantealex (19th August 2015),vkangas (18th August 2015)



Reply With Quote
But minimum height is 1270mm, which is around the height of Porsche Cayman and a bit less than 992. Abarth 124 is 3-4 cm lower and Alpine is around 2 cm lower. Both BMW M2 and M4 are aroud 12cm...
WRC mainclass from 2027