Page 103 of 132 FirstFirst ... 35393101102103104105113 ... LastLast
Results 1,021 to 1,030 of 1316
  1. 15th February 2015, 11:00 #1021
    KKS
    KKS is offline
    Senior Member KKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kyiv
    Posts
    5,794
    Like
    2,920
    Liked 1,533 Times in 914 Posts
    Send a message via ICQ to KKS
    Anybody see road condition after 1st passage?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 15th February 2015, 11:00 #1022
    rallyfiend
    rallyfiend is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,710
    Like
    11
    Liked 783 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 6789 View Post
    Yeah doesn't make any sense. Same as the repeated stage from yesterday
    Apparently they had to dismantle everything to move it to today's stage during the gap so no repeat coverage of Colin's Crest.

    I guess they use the first pass as a reharsal?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 15th February 2015, 11:04 #1023
    dupanton
    dupanton is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,901
    Like
    475
    Liked 1,495 Times in 586 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    Apparently they had to dismantle everything to move it to today's stage during the gap so no repeat coverage of Colin's Crest.

    I guess they use the first pass as a reharsal?
    Few years ago a LOCAL swedish TV channel could broadcast (almost) all the WRC Sweden stages live. Why on earth wouldn't an organisation like WRC be able to broadcast 2 stages/day...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. Likes: A FONDO (15th February 2015),HaCo (15th February 2015),KKS (15th February 2015),spark13 (15th February 2015)
  5. 15th February 2015, 11:08 #1024
    COD
    COD is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    5,019
    Like
    390
    Liked 444 Times in 219 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WUff1 View Post
    Always the same moanings of JML: "I should have realised this earlier. It is a new car, but unfortunately it does not work like this. Also, I have been playing with different things. Things that working in the old car, do not work in the new car."

    He´ll never be a champion ...
    Yes, my thoughts exatly. He is a pro in pro team. What are they doing in tests, if not trying how changes affect the car?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. Likes: A FONDO (15th February 2015),WUff1 (15th February 2015)
  7. 15th February 2015, 11:09 #1025
    rallyfiend
    rallyfiend is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,710
    Like
    11
    Liked 783 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dupanton View Post
    Few years ago a LOCAL swedish TV channel could broadcast (almost) all the WRC Sweden stages live. Why on earth wouldn't an organisation like WRC be able to broadcast 2 stages/day...
    A local TV station is doing it to a quality standard that they're happy with, whereas WRC has to do it to a standard that all their broadcasters are happy with.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. Likes: jparker (15th February 2015)
  9. 15th February 2015, 11:10 #1026
    Sulland
    Sulland is offline
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,504
    Like
    2,114
    Liked 1,428 Times in 741 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HaCo View Post
    Mads out, where is Citroen from their glory years?
    Hard to deny, looking at MC 2015 that the car is ok, and the factorydrivers struggle to get the best out of it!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. Likes: dimviii (15th February 2015)
  11. 15th February 2015, 11:12 #1027
    skarderud
    skarderud is offline
    Senior Member skarderud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    lillehammer
    Posts
    1,682
    Like
    1,860
    Liked 881 Times in 431 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    A local TV station is doing it to a quality standard that they're happy with, whereas WRC has to do it to a standard that all their broadcasters are happy with.
    It wasnt just a local tv station, it was svt, the swedish state television.
    Radioreporter @ www.radiomotor.no

    KNA Lillehammer Motorsport
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 15th February 2015, 11:13 #1028
    dupanton
    dupanton is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,901
    Like
    475
    Liked 1,495 Times in 586 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    A local TV station is doing it to a quality standard that they're happy with, whereas WRC has to do it to a standard that all their broadcasters are happy with.
    Broadcast was about the same, but without the onboard footage.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 15th February 2015, 11:16 #1029
    KKS
    KKS is offline
    Senior Member KKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kyiv
    Posts
    5,794
    Like
    2,920
    Liked 1,533 Times in 914 Posts
    Send a message via ICQ to KKS
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    A local TV station is doing it to a quality standard that they're happy with, whereas WRC has to do it to a standard that all their broadcasters are happy with.
    Streaming in 480p 2 stages it's better than one in 720p
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. Likes: dupanton (15th February 2015),HaCo (15th February 2015),Sulland (15th February 2015)
  15. 15th February 2015, 11:23 #1030
    Jef Pauly
    Jef Pauly is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2
    Like
    2
    Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rallyfiend View Post
    A local TV station is doing it to a quality standard that they're happy with, whereas WRC has to do it to a standard that all their broadcasters are happy with.
    That is a lame excuse if I've seen any. WRC 'quality' standards are s**t if you ask me, most of the time the audio balance between the commentators and cars levels is so bad that the speech is completely drowned out, their cameras fail constantly. There's no extra on screen information provided - ever, besides timing, as my wife - who's trying to develop an interest in the sport rightfully pointed out : no (current/top/avg) speed, no metrics on the car or the driver, no inboard footage of the driver's footwork. It's basic to the extra fullest.
    And let's not even talk about their choices on which stages to broadcast. This rally was a prime example: 21 stages to choose from, and out of the mere 3 they gracefully give us wrc+ subscribers, they include SS1 - which is frankly the most boring "rally" stage I've ever seen. Frankly, their work verges on amateurish most often than not. So much about that quality standard.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. Likes: A FONDO (15th February 2015),AndyRAC (15th February 2015),Miika (15th February 2015),skarderud (15th February 2015),spark13 (15th February 2015)
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules