Page 18 of 308 FirstFirst ... 816171819202868118 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 3074

Thread: Wrc+

  1. #171
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    I suspect this isn't the usual "spice" post by you. Just to educate you. 30, 60, 120 and so on frames per second is NTSC standard. You're still in the PAL zone. And technically all FullHD broadcast footage is 50fps, it's just interlaced.

    4K won't be mainstream any time soon, considering that majority of TV channels on this planet are still in SD. Quite a large number of stations are still broadcast in 4:3 aspect ratio. And besides TV cameras cost a fortune (one high-end FullHD TV camera costs $80k, 4K ones start from $100k), so only the filthy rich will upgrade their equipment to 4K. But who will they show the almighty 4K? A minority.

    Even when WRC+ is far from perfect, it's a comfortable way to consume the broadcasted material legally and without extra hassle.
    apart from the technical blah blah that we do not care..

    WRC+ is crap as it is... its good for bottom feeders and i am sure there are plenty but when you broadcast at crap resolution and crap Fps you do not deserve a penny from proper humans.

    i never said that they should broadcast at 4k i said 720p and 60fps or at least as high as those girly nobodies enjoy the F1. In motorsport and sports in general fast frames per second counts, it is not a noire movie of the 50s.

  2. #172
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,891
    Like
    144
    Liked 1,104 Times in 498 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    i never said that they should broadcast at 4k i said 720p and 60fps or at least as high as those girly nobodies enjoy the F1. In motorsport and sports in general fast frames per second counts, it is not a noire movie of the 50s.
    You want everything in slooooo-moooo? Or what's with the damn 50/60 fps. For proper slowmotion you need to be at 100 or 200 fps.

    Okay, the image quality isn't the best. Your other option is either some shitty pirate stream or TV.
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  3. #173
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    I suspect this isn't the usual "spice" post by you. Just to educate you. 30, 60, 120 and so on frames per second is NTSC standard. You're still in the PAL zone. And technically all FullHD broadcast footage is 50fps, it's just interlaced.

    4K won't be mainstream any time soon, considering that majority of TV channels on this planet are still in SD. Quite a large number of stations are still broadcast in 4:3 aspect ratio. And besides TV cameras cost a fortune (one high-end FullHD TV camera costs $80k, 4K ones start from $100k), so only the filthy rich will upgrade their equipment to 4K. But who will they show the almighty 4K? A minority.

    Even when WRC+ is far from perfect, it's a comfortable way to consume the broadcasted material legally and without extra hassle.
    The live stages & daily reviews are good enough with HD quality. The same should be with the onboards, I don't really care about the timing synchronization, than the quality of the videos, that includes the camera position as well. Otherwise the service is good for the money.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  4. #174
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    913
    Like
    405
    Liked 501 Times in 257 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EightGear View Post
    The onboard video quality on the WRC Youtube page is better (in 1080p) than all onboards on WRC+, which is quite strange since it's from the same cameras.
    Surely it must be the video player they are using?
    Streaming live is a whole different board game to what can be recorded locally with a camera, must rely on a lot of other factors which can be very costly.

    For what it's worth, I think that this service should be available for free; not to save me a few pennies, but to open it up to the viewers that the manufacturers are in this to attract.

    As far as I can see, the benefit free coverage could provide would vastly outweigh the relative pittance they will make through WRC+. WEC (another niche series) seems to have made the same decision, much to their detriment.
    aka Rodger Davies

  5. #175
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,891
    Like
    144
    Liked 1,104 Times in 498 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge33cymru View Post
    Streaming live is a whole different board game to what can be recorded locally with a camera, must rely on a lot of other factors which can be very costly.

    For what it's worth, I think that this service should be available for free; not to save me a few pennies, but to open it up to the viewers that the manufacturers are in this to attract.

    As far as I can see, the benefit free coverage could provide would vastly outweigh the relative pittance they will make through WRC+. WEC (another niche series) seems to have made the same decision, much to their detriment.
    Then what's the point of TV channels buying the rights, if the same thing is available for free

    WRC+ is just a bonus to the TV rights deal
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  6. #176
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Varna, Bulgaria
    Posts
    899
    Like
    153
    Liked 222 Times in 101 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dodge33cymru View Post
    I'm loathe to ask this, but why does it have no respect for the customer? It looks infinitely better value than the WEC's equivalent offering to me and it's much more logical to spend Ł30 for a year of recorded content (that I'll download) than on a BT Sport subscription that would cost me literally 30x more?

    If the live stages are on demand and at least 480p, then that's all I need to know.
    Actually the live streamed stages are available in HD format and also the daily highlights are also in HD if you have enough fast internet connection. Only the onboards are in poor quality.

  7. #177
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    You want everything in slooooo-moooo? Or what's with the damn 50/60 fps. For proper slowmotion you need to be at 100 or 200 fps.

    Okay, the image quality isn't the best. Your other option is either some shitty pirate stream or TV.
    you have some kind of disability to understand simple sentences ??? who talked about slow motion ???

  8. #178
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,516
    Like
    544
    Liked 1,064 Times in 465 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rage82 View Post
    Actually the live streamed stages are available in HD format and also the daily highlights are also in HD if you have enough fast internet connection. Only the onboards are in poor quality.
    Exactly, while the exact same onboard videos on Youtube are much better.

  9. #179
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,891
    Like
    144
    Liked 1,104 Times in 498 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    you have some kind of disability to understand simple sentences ??? who talked about slow motion ???
    Then stop talking about high frame rates since that's only useful for slow motion. You get sharp images/frames with a high shutter value. You are talking about minimal motion blur for the action shots.
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  10. #180
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    Then stop talking about high frame rates since that's only useful for slow motion. You get sharp images/frames with a high shutter value. You are talking about minimal motion blur for the action shots.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nU2_ERC_oE

    as you can see these two correlate....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •