Results 31 to 40 of 102
-
5th August 2014, 16:51 #31
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 2,245
- Like
- 1,148
- Liked 193 Times in 131 Posts
No teamorder = the driver can do all strategi and planning by himself. In Lewis case this is maybe true, who am I to tell.
-
5th August 2014, 19:58 #32
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Terra Germanica
- Posts
- 2,948
- Like
- 17
- Liked 146 Times in 122 Posts
IN Mercedes' view it wasn't a team order to change the result to a more favourable one. Lewis was on a two-stopper, ROS on a three-stopper, so all Lewis had to do was to stay within 20 secs of Nico. There had been a clear agreement at Merc - when the cars are on different strategies, they don't interfer with each other, and Lewis broke that agreement and cost ROS unneccessary time.
как могу я знать что я думаю, пока не слушал что я говорю
-
5th August 2014, 21:50 #33
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 1,461
- Like
- 109
- Liked 47 Times in 35 Posts
Where was that stated,that when they are on different strategies they don't interfere with each other ?Who told you about "The Clear Strategy" ? Paddy told Lewis to let Nico past,at no time did Lewis refuse to let him past at that point in the race .Lewis said "When he is near enough he can come past" But Nico was never near enough to take that advantage so really in that part of the race Nico was not held up .When Nico pitted and came out with new tyres,it was then a race to the finish ,and at this point there were NO team orders or requests to Lewis,and he defended his position to the end of the race as any RACING driver would have done in his position.
Nico,s problem seemed to be with Charlie bringing the safety car out ,in Nico,s eyes at the wrong time .But Charlie can see all the race on cameras where as Nico only see,s what's happening around him !
- Likes: rjbetty (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 03:03 #34
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,492
- Like
- 640
- Liked 820 Times in 609 Posts
I totally agree , dj , and fully believe Lewis was being a wee touch too paranoid .
They told him plainly that he'd destroy his tires racing Nico , yet he made sure he stayed ahead .
Even ol' one ear said they shouldn't have asked him to slow down to let his team mate past , when slowing down is exactly what they wanted , so he would have enough tires to battle near the end .
A little less wear and he might have been able to keep Ricciardo behind him , and have a stab at Fred for the win .
He clearly held his team mate behind to destroy his strategy , and destroyed his own at the same time , costing points , likely from both cars , for his team .
He pi$$ed off the team , and the team mate , for third .
But , he beat his team mate , so it was all worth it .
Sure it was . I'm tellin' ya .
By the way , dj , I think our Mia was trying to(maybe just a touch sarcastically) suggest that perhaps Lewis doesn't think he needs strategists , and can do it all himself .
- Likes: Mia 01 (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 11:09 #35
But how were team interests threatened here? Lets say Hamilton gives way and Rosberg moves up but has to stop again - most likely ends up behing LH again after his stop. so no change for the team points there - infact Hamilton might well have moved up a place by then.
Tito Vilanova = :champion:
-
6th August 2014, 11:55 #36
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
Considering Rosberg made the final stop and was hounding Hamilton at the end suggests Lewis made the right call. He kept his team mate behind him and prevented him from winning the race. Of course it was worth it. He closed the gap slightly in the championship and the team agreed he was right to stop Nico passing and they admitted they shouldn't have asked. Paranoid fans rather than paranoid drivers.
.
- Likes: rjbetty (6th August 2014),truefan72 (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 13:16 #37
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,492
- Like
- 640
- Liked 820 Times in 609 Posts
- Likes: Mia 01 (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 13:23 #38
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
They didn't word it by saying they were wrong directly , but they said they shouldn't have asked it. Interpret that how you will.
Toto Wolf: "We cannot expect the drivers in the second half of the season to move over for their main competitor."
Spin it all against Hamilton all you like, you usually do..
- Likes: truefan72 (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 14:01 #39
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,492
- Like
- 640
- Liked 820 Times in 609 Posts
Zetsche says this :
"It is true, however, that Rosberg and Hamilton are not to impede each other with different strategies -- for example two stops versus three stops ."
I couldn't find you the "not happy" quote , but that's a good one , isn't it ?
By the way , it's Lewis that spun , not me .
He's the one who caused this controversy by following only the orders that suited him .
And , that was a cheap shot , by the way , as you know full well that I will rail against anyone not following team orders .
They told him three times to move over .
- Likes: Mia 01 (6th August 2014)
-
6th August 2014, 14:43 #40
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
It wasn't a cheap shot and there is no controversy. Things didn't work out for Nico and he was unhappy initially. They have moved on and the points gap closed a little. I hope they continue to fight for the championship without the team trying to manipulate the finishing positions. We want to see racing, not drivers waving each other through to give away points.
End of fabricated saga, onto Spa..
Watched Tanak onboard for a few stages today and man it does look like 50/50 for every second corner :lips:. Personally I expected Oliver to score high and show some good speed but he showed today...
[WRC] Delfi Rally Estonia 2025