Page 94 of 439 FirstFirst ... 44849293949596104144194 ... LastLast
Results 931 to 940 of 4386
  1. #931
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    The problem with hybrids is that it's a technology non-suitable for use by privateers. It's too complicated and it must be extremely costly for private teams. In rallying they also have to work in very rough conditions so I'm a bit afraid of safety. Especially of spectators who push cars back on the road after crashes. That's something not present on circuits. Circuit cars have warning lights showing when marshals/mechanics must not touch them but such warning can not work with a crowd of partly drunk ordinary people.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  2. Likes: 6789 (5th July 2014)
  3. #932
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,361
    Like
    2,752
    Liked 1,281 Times in 698 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PLuto View Post
    I dont want hybrid technology in rallysport, at least not now. I want same rules for everybody. And it is difficult to have correct regulations for petrol, diesel or hybrid cars. We can see how this new technologies destroyed WEC...

    Destroyed WEC?? Are you being serious.... It's the strongest of the FiA World Championships... With more Manufacturers joining; as it's road relevant technology.
    However, the Privateers don't have to use hybrids, as it's too costly. That could be something for the WRC to consider if they went down the hybrid route.

    As Mirek has said, the safety issue with hybrids is a concern. They could get around this from banning spectators..... And only having viewing zones... ( I'm only joking)
    Last edited by AndyRAC; 5th July 2014 at 13:00.

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  4. Likes: Mirek (5th July 2014)
  5. #933
    Senior Member Lundefaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    658
    Like
    332
    Liked 887 Times in 277 Posts
    https://translate.google.com/transla...g%2Findex.html

    Very good! More power, all we need now is less friction/grip from the tires, and limited suspension travel, and we have a show!
    https://www.facebook.com/noseendfirst?ref=hl#

  6. #934
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lundefaret View Post
    https://translate.google.com/transla...g%2Findex.html

    Very good! More power, all we need now is less friction/grip from the tires, and limited suspension travel, and we have a show!
    there is already a sport for you to enjoy...

    http://formulad.com/

    no need to implement stupid ideas to the WRC.

  7. #935
    Senior Member Lundefaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    658
    Like
    332
    Liked 887 Times in 277 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    there is already a sport for you to enjoy...

    http://formulad.com/

    no need to implement stupid ideas to the WRC.
    Hehe "Stupid is what stupid does"

    I was thinking more in the lines of Group B, but I guess You think that Group B rallying is the lowpoint of the rallysport

    There are three very important factors that suggests that lowering grip/friction is a good way to go:

    1) Safety (lower cornering speeds)
    2) Longevity (the tires and cars of today creates so much grip that they are very tough on the roads. This destruction of the roads, both in the WRC and in local rallies (we are of cource talking about gravel) translates in to it being more and more difficult to find roads to arrange rallies on, and more and more expensive to hire/rebuild the roads.)
    3) Show (for obvious reasons)
    https://www.facebook.com/noseendfirst?ref=hl#

  8. #936
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,456
    Like
    5,913
    Liked 2,948 Times in 1,682 Posts
    N.O.T. not always knows what we´re talking about Lundefaret. You have a point when it comes to WRC to be more spectacular. Better so than having Superrally and shoot-outs.
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  9. #937
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lundefaret View Post
    Hehe "Stupid is what stupid does"

    I was thinking more in the lines of Group B, but I guess You think that Group B rallying is the lowpoint of the rallysport

    There are three very important factors that suggests that lowering grip/friction is a good way to go:

    1) Safety (lower cornering speeds)
    2) Longevity (the tires and cars of today creates so much grip that they are very tough on the roads. This destruction of the roads, both in the WRC and in local rallies (we are of cource talking about gravel) translates in to it being more and more difficult to find roads to arrange rallies on, and more and more expensive to hire/rebuild the roads.)
    3) Show (for obvious reasons)
    So you want more power but lower cornering speeds.... that makes sense... why you want more power then ?

    Longenity of the roads is just a joke to use as an excuse... and again how exactly more power is going to add to that ?

    And as for show you can visit local village road shows if you consider drifts "show".

  10. #938
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    4,933
    Like
    356
    Liked 408 Times in 201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    So you want more power but lower cornering speeds.... that makes sense... why you want more power then ?

    Longenity of the roads is just a joke to use as an excuse... and again how exactly more power is going to add to that ?

    And as for show you can visit local village road shows if you consider drifts "show".
    More power + less grip from suspension, tyres and diffs would make WRC more spectacular and less like racing lines on forests as it is now. What would be wrong with more show for spectators? The biggest problem of WRC today is not enough spectators (TV mostly). The drifts show probably are more popular than WRC now...

  11. #939
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    So you want more power but lower cornering speeds.... that makes sense... why you want more power then ?
    Strictly technically speaking there is no contradiction in that statement. Cornering speed has nothing to do with power.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  12. #940
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Strictly technically speaking there is no contradiction in that statement. Cornering speed has nothing to do with power.
    technically speaking yes there is not a contradiction since cornering speed is dependent on traction, but in real life terms when you have 2 corners close to each other the car must have enough power to reach the limit of traction speed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •