Results 1 to 10 of 53

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,949
    Like
    173
    Liked 308 Times in 206 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13 View Post
    Interesting, but I personally would hate to see TC back. I like the cars being difficult to drive.

    What I would do, is get rid of the limited fuel. I would either give them as much fuel as they need or maybe even bring back refuelling.

    To be honest. I am enjoying F1 so far this season, but I cant see F1 improving in the longer term for me, because the sport IMO is getting to bogged down.

    Its hard to decide. Technology is important but that leads to less driver input and a lesser sporting challenge.

    I guess the answer is that everyone wants and likes different things.

    What does seem certain is the number of people losing interest in F1 is increasing.

    ^ +1.

    I like to see the cars being more difficult to drive which puts more emphasis on driver skill. If anything, I'd actually like to see the aero reduced even further.



    Quote Originally Posted by philipbain View Post
    (Snip) ........The only constant in change and F1's new regs have been a step in the right direction, encouraging the development of high performance hybrid drive train technology which should trickle down to the products driven on the road by you and I meaning we can all drive further on less fuel and limit the environmental impact of motoring whilst reducing the rate of depletion of a finite source of energy. Thats right, this is about a much bigger picture, in this context moaning about a reduced level of noise is pretty pathetic!

    Pathetic? I don't think so. You have raised some valid points and yes you are certainly right about there being the all important much bigger picture.... but doesn't that bigger picture also have to include and maintain a certain appeal to a large part of the demographic of F1 fans who seek high entertainment value and consider the sound to be an important part of the spectacle? There has to be a balance... if that part is ignored and viewing figures fall through the floor then surely advertising in F1 becomes devalued by team sponsors which in turn impacts the teams budgets and the value of participating in the sport and so on.....

    Also, combined with the above.
    Despite what the general public may think, the current hybrid drive/energy harvesting systems used in F1 are actually nothing new. It is also nigh on impossible that the manufacturers could find a loophole which would allow a new innovative, ground breaking, green technology to be found and developed within the extremely tight, current F1 technical regulations.
    For the first time I find myself actually agreeing with BE that other racing formats perhaps such as the Endurance Sports Car Racing class LMP1, which is just as technologically advanced as F1 if not more so, is just much better suited to finding breakthroughs in the design and development of Hybrid Drive/Energy Harvesting Technology which will still percolate down to road car level and also fits in to the 'endurance' aspect of that sport format much more naturally.
    Last edited by Zico; 6th April 2014 at 14:13.
    The emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •