Results 1 to 10 of 184
Thread: McLaren lose Hamilton appeal
Threaded View
-
28th September 2008, 00:25 #37
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 1,827
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
How did they make it worse? maybe it was their positive spin on it:
************************************************** ********
The court heard the tape of Whiting saying that he believed the move was OK. What does not make sense is that given this attitude Whiting had no reason to write a report to the FIA Stewards, a necessary step in the awarding of penalties.
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns20791.html
************************************************** ********
As I have stated, I do not believe there was enough time between the incedent and and announcement it was under investigation for Charli to change his mind and "write" a report. After hutting around the web for a few hours, the closest I could find was a blogger that was at the hearing saying the after the call with MAcleran, that Charlie "informed" the stewards about the move.
So what doesn't make sense to grandprix.com, makes sense to me... Mac called Whiting for clarification, Charlie called the Stewards and gave them a heads up, Stwards call for an investigation of the incident where Charlie got a better view of the incident, and changed his opinion of it... a penalty is decided on, and Charlie writes up his report...
The Grandprix.com story makes out like Charlie was two faced, said one thing to MacLeran, hung up the phone and started writing up a report that MacLeran broke the rules... And I don't buy that...The Preceding post may have contained nudity, sexuality, violence, coarse language and Jacques
Villeneuve and is intended for a mature audience, parental guidance is advised.
So you wanna know what the PS Stands for.
Sesks today https://x.com/paddocknews/status/1802627019244462570
WRC Testing