Results 1 to 10 of 1296
			
		Thread: WRC future
Threaded View
- 
	11th March 2020, 10:48 #11Senior Member    
 - Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,748
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
 No, that's not true. They made every changes which they saw as a step forward for having better stage times. Whatever they found to be an advantage (and allowed) they used. There were huge steps towards better handing such as placing the engine in-front of the rear axle as well. Audi insisting for long time on having the longitudinal I5 engine in-front of the front axle was a result of marketing decision going against the technical arguments. The tyre and suspension development was not sleeping either. 
 
 That comes from the limits of the rules. When You limit the areas for the development all focus concentrates on them. That's normal.
 
 The racing used to be all about the current technology until the breaking point being possibly the late gr.B crisis. You can't mix the level of technology with stuff being used in stock automotive production. That is two different things.
 
 That is true but it wasn't always like that.Last edited by Mirek; 11th March 2020 at 11:20. Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
 
- Likes: CWJ (11th March 2020)


 Originally Posted by denkimi
 Originally Posted by denkimi
					
 
					
					
					
						 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote
 
			
		 
			 
						
					
						 
						
					
						 
			 
						
					
						 
						
					
						
Can somebody with a YT account drop a comment to Jon, poor chap is confused and spreading fake news https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQKdoIA8yPI a) M-Sport did not rule out building a 2027 car,...
WRC mainclass from 2027