Guns Guns Guns, Now Paris!

[Robinho]

Exactly. Then it must follow that said person has an individual religion - total followers: 1.



Lack of belief is NOT atheism but elleipsitheism.
Atheism is from "a" (none) and "theos" (gods). Atheism is a positive belief in the statement that there is/are no god(s).

It's kind of strange for someone to defend a faith structure they don't believe in. Could this be a demonstration of religion; ergo, what I'd said in the first place?

I fundamentally disagree with your interpretations, firstly of what a religion is (informing your behaviour on anything else than religious doctrine is not a religion. Religion does not exist without invented god(s). I disagree I have a faith structure, I am not defined by Atheism as it has nothing to do to inform the rest of my life. And I disagree with a belief in the lack of something even being possible. Quoting Ricky Gervais, Atheism is a religion in the same way not going skiing is a sport. It's a bit clumsy and I'm sure you can argue the semantics of it, but I don't know why you would.

Do you believe in god? If so which one? If not, what do you catergorise yourself as?