Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    6,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Stupid mover by Tony and his crew chief to stay out on the track. They not only screwed themselves but took out a bunch of other contenders.
    i'll bet there is a vote up tomorrow on who won the race and Bowyer will get the most votes hands down.
    "If you can help others, and fail to do so, your time on earth has been wasted" - Roberto Clemente

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Florida!
    Posts
    1,532
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    WOW.

    NASCAR just make CRAP up these days. First, absolutly right, Tony should have won. He had it when the rain hit, and as darkness rolled in, NASCAR knew they couldn't finish the race distance well before they restarted it.

    But then they restarted, and REALLY screwed Boyer. He should be looking at his second chase win. But no, they to go and award the win to a guy who ran out of fuel under caution before he took the checker??? What the...!!!! It was only 2? months ago that Robby Gordon was ordered back 15 spots for "not maintaining pace" at Montreal.

    Absolutly unreal. Rule book in pencil? HA. Decided on the spot, and tonight Helton was drunk.

    Here is a serious point: it has gotten bad enough that NASCAR needs to be put on notice by somebody (Congress, the Nevada Gaming Commision, whoever polices things like this) that they are going to only be considered "entertainment" (like pro-wrestling & Survivor) and not actual "sports events" like football, baseball, or golf.
    N.Hayden L.Hamilton D.Earnhardt R.Gordon S.Speed T.Stewart J.P.Montoya G.Rahal Ferrari Lotus

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Between Laguna Seca and Sears Point
    Posts
    5,956
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DavePI2
    and nascar fans wonder why others question if it is on the level or not.
    NASCAR fans are the ones who started and have always questioned things like this.

    I'd say 95% of the time a strange call is on the level, the other 5% is incompetence, idiocy, ego, and $$$$. Not much worse than what goes on in any sport(or racing series) at that rate.
    Racing season is soon upon us!:smokin:

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    6,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Totally disagree. This is the chase and the race should not be prematurely called. There was absolutely no reason to call the race and they were right to continue to a point of darkness and then call it.
    "If you can help others, and fail to do so, your time on earth has been wasted" - Roberto Clemente

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Between Laguna Seca and Sears Point
    Posts
    5,956
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by muggle not
    Totally disagree. This is the chase and the race should not be prematurely called. There was absolutely no reason to call the race and they were right to continue to a point of darkness and then call it.
    I agree with you. The distance they set(lap 25) would have made for over 70 laps of racing, so, at least one more pit stop...that is a long enough period to see it as a natural conclusion to the race. The drivers have some responsibility here too, and they F'ed it up on the first lap back under green racing like idiots 3 wide on a green track.

    The only calls I don't like by NASCAR here was the decision to not have a GWC(as that is standard procedure) and to overlook and/or have an unclear rule as it relates to Bifle's inability to maintain a proper speed under caution.

    The reason this is all so clear is the obvious fact that Bifle should NOT have been the winner in the "moral" sense, due to the above mentioned circumstances and the inference that he clearly would not have been able to run the last 4 laps if Montoya had not brought out a caution. That is slightly immaterial, but it cannot help but to color everyone's perception of the race.
    Racing season is soon upon us!:smokin:

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    6,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    That really pretty well sums it up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoss Ghoul
    I agree with you. The distance they set(lap 25) would have made for over 70 laps of racing, so, at least one more pit stop...that is a long enough period to see it as a natural conclusion to the race. The drivers have some responsibility here too, and they F'ed it up on the first lap back under green racing like idiots 3 wide on a green track.

    The only calls I don't like by NASCAR here was the decision to not have a GWC(as that is standard procedure) and to overlook and/or have an unclear rule as it relates to Bifle's inability to maintain a proper speed under caution.

    The reason this is all so clear is the obvious fact that Bifle should NOT have been the winner in the "moral" sense, due to the above mentioned circumstances and the inference that he clearly would not have been able to run the last 4 laps if Montoya had not brought out a caution. That is slightly immaterial, but it cannot help but to color everyone's perception of the race.
    "If you can help others, and fail to do so, your time on earth has been wasted" - Roberto Clemente

  7. #17
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    I have never commented on the NASCAR thread but this Biffle incident is beyond ridiculous. He couldn't maintain the pace car speed and ran out of gas. What was the rest of the field supposed to do, follow him at 25 mph ?

    ridiuculous

    he shouldn't have won

    NASCAR with immediate effect needs to set a minimum pace speed
    you can't argue with results.

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    For Sale
    Posts
    11,616
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I can't believe Biffle even quoted saying that he could've passed the pace car if he wanted too. what total BS his car was out of fuel and couldn't be refired.
    Brian France is a violation of Section 12-1 (actions detrimental to stock car racing)

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,720
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,406
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MD24
    WTF is cautious pace?
    Cautious pace: No faster than the pace car, but still traveling forward. It doesn't matter if he's crossing the line on the starter motor. As long as he can finish with out a push, he wins.

    Biffle is still moving forward, thus voiding any one's attempt to pass.
    racing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
    9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •