[WRC] News & Rumours (part V) 2017

[stefanvv]

How much have Autosport taken this out of context/made more of it than there really is?

This

[rayh_mx]

Grönholm said in newest finnish rally magazine (vauhdin maailma) that he is going to secret test. OK now we know that test is with Skoda. Just guessing is it somekind start of Skodas wrc project or just r5 test without any big secrets??

Will it be the reuse of the engineering used in VW, without using that logo?

[RS]

Will it be the reuse of the engineering used in VW, without using that logo?

VW can use Skoda's R5 experience and Skoda VW's WRC experience, seems fair

[liposh]

Guys, to make it clear: There is 0,1% chance that this secret testing was Skoda comeback to WRC and 99,9% chance that it is secret testing of VW R5 which is simply copying of Skoda R5 knowhow.

[Mirek]

VW can use Skoda's R5 experience and Skoda VW's WRC experience, seems fair

Hold your horses Ron. I don't see a Škoda WRC coming any time soon (if at all).

[RS]

Hold your horses Ron. I don't see a Škoda WRC coming any time soon (if at all).

I know, but what I wrote would seem fair and sensible.

Skoda already issused a statement earlier in the year saying R5 works well for them, and fits well with their zero-risk 'everything must be sensible and make a profit' approach.

[itix]

Jesus Christ... there's only VW to blame, no-one else. Ofcourse he'd deserve to be in WRC, no doubt, but hey, it was his employer who pulled the plug in November! The teams are allowed to make their own decisions and at the end of the day it's them who decide who's got a seat. So all this childish talk that "I don't think I have anything to prove to anybody"... aargh, it's not what you think, or what your fans or anyone else think - it's the decision the teams make. And if you're sitting mid-February without a car, then yes, you do have something to prove. Simple as that. And for the millointh time, he wasn't left without a seat as it's often being drawn out - his team just quit. There's a huge difference there.

And this "It would show the sport in a really negative way if I had to do this."... how hypocrite is that? We've had guys like Camilli doing full season, Al-Qassimi drives a factory Citroen every now and then and suddenly, if Mikkelsen would have to pay for a drive it'd "show the sport in a really negative way"?

What did Vatanen do in 1982 (as a defending World Champ)? Or Petter in 2008? They both could've used the same excuses Mikkelsen is using, but instead they actually DID something.

Correct! Coupled with his party personality and the fact that he thinks he's above certain things it does make him a prima donna

...or r princess as I would prefer. I have never really liked him and this really doesn't add to his plus account.

Ogier did a whole year in wrc 2 and his employer didn't even pull out. A lot of the time employers fall in real life, outside his bubble, and employees go to other less glorious jobs temporarily to get back to something of similar "status" eventually.

[Eli]

http://www.wrc.com/en/wrc/news/febru...3--12-12-.html
Back to Olbia it is then.

[PLuto]

Ogier did a whole year in wrc 2 and his employer didn't even pull out.

To be correct, he was not in WRC2 or SWRC. In that entry with Skoda S2000 he was not-registered driver.

[itix]

To be correct, he was not in WRC2 or SWRC. In that entry with Skoda S2000 he was not-registered driver.

So even "worse" then.