Originally Posted by
truefan72
I can see William's issue with prodrive, but I am not sure that they are going about it in the most productivve manner. Besides, isn't theFIA about to change the rules anyway?
Yes there are some ethical questions to be asked about prodrive, it is one thing to inherit an outdated Arrows chasis, or a slightly uncompetitive Red Bull car ( even though it shouldn't make a difference) but a whole other issue to inherit the prevous year's winning F1 chasis. With all the RD freeze etc. I dare say that even next year, the 2007 McClaren car would be more than a match for most cars. I'm not sure that a reduced winnings payout for customer cars is enough of a deterrant to disuade this practice.
I also seem to recall that the earlier Sauber cars were essentially tuned down ferrari clones. But I'm not sure how those rules applied then.
Prodrive had 2 years to prepare for F1, why didn't they develop their own chasis at the very least.
IMO Toro Rosso and Super Aguri should be working on their own chasis now.
Perhaps they should institute a 1 year cap on using customer chasis, if the team can't develop their own car after 1 year in F1 then they shouldn't be in the sport.
I remember the days when up to 15 teams were in F1 all trying to do their own thing.
No B-teams for me please
Max Verstappen holds onto Emilia Romagna GP win after tense Lando Norris scrap. The pair fought to the very end following a tense final stint, but it was the Red Bull star who came out on top....
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...