Results 521 to 530 of 627
-
19th July 2007, 06:43 #521
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by HawkmoonWhen in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
19th July 2007, 08:17 #522
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Posts
- 2,377
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by tamburello
In the legal system he would automatically be dismissed if he was a judge or a juror due to prejudice. This must be seen as a fair hearing regardless of the outcome!"You can mop the blood up later." - R.A. Lafferty
-
19th July 2007, 08:29 #523
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by wmcot
p.s. strangely, this particular story seems to have been taken off the Autosport websiteRiccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
19th July 2007, 08:41 #524
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
More food for thought
It was a quiet weekend in the Formula 1 world with not much happening beyond more leaks in Italy regarding what was in Mike Coughlan's affadavit. It seems that this has been leaked to members of the Italian media by Ferrari- ostensibly the only people in Italy who have the document - although it may only be the parts that Ferrari wants the media to know.
Manipulating the press is all the rage at the moment in F1 circles but it might be wistest for all concerned if they either stopped leaking details and got on with the legal processes or made the affadavit available to the public. That way they will all avoid the suspicion that they are trying to use the information to create as much damage as possible to the oppositionRiccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
19th July 2007, 12:42 #525
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 1,227
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1Justice is blind but doesn't have to be stupid.
-
19th July 2007, 13:07 #526
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Here's a question:
Why would Mike Couglan show "the document" to McLaren team members if the reason he had it was as part of a planned move to another teamRiccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
19th July 2007, 13:18 #527
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Maybe he wanted some of them to join him at another team. Who knows? Maybe he was just being stupid.When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
19th July 2007, 13:30 #528
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 431
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry for my ignorance, but I don't understand the reason why Couglan had to make a copy of the full document?
Was he looking to send copies to someonelse or he wanted just to keep a copy in case the original document may disapear?
-
19th July 2007, 13:40 #529
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 18,921
- Like
- 0
- Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Maybe he was making copies from the Discs? But why he needed a hard copy is something that I can't understand either.
When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
-
19th July 2007, 13:45 #530
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 431
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
1 Sordo 2 Neuville 3 Evans 4 Tanak 5 Ogier 6 Rovanpera 7 Suninen 8 Meeke raffrantic
WRC PICKEMS 2024 - Round 5 RALLY...