Results 1 to 10 of 161

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,858
    Like
    62
    Liked 478 Times in 371 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitrodaze View Post
    The lastest release of the onboard video show it was clearly intentional. Verstappen can be seen to delay turning into the corner until he had Hamilton off the track before he started turning the wheel. It is very hard to see why the stewards did not take punitive action. Check this out
    Agreed. I think there needs to be a rule that these sort of incidents be reviewed after if the stewards decide no action and a grid penalty applied the next race should they get it wrong.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,461
    Like
    14
    Liked 792 Times in 654 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Black Knight View Post
    Agreed. I think there needs to be a rule that these sort of incidents be reviewed after if the stewards decide no action and a grid penalty applied the next race should they get it wrong.
    If you and l can see it, it really beggars the question of why the so-called stewards cannot see it. It just smacks of incompetence or corruption. They were able to see seatbelt was loosened. Which is harder to decern than a driver running another of the track.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  3. Likes: truefan72 (17th November 2021)
  4. #3
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    Yup, simply put, they feigned lack of on-boards to provide cover as they just didn't want to rule against verstappen to "affect" the race. But they had no problems DQ'ing Hamilton from Qualy because a damaged rear wing was .2mm above the threshold. Ok got it!. SMH

    Here is Palmer's analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZquZxUHtC0
    you can't argue with results.

  5. Likes: Nitrodaze (17th November 2021)
  6. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,461
    Like
    14
    Liked 792 Times in 654 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by truefan72 View Post
    Yup, simply put, they feigned lack of on-boards to provide cover as they just didn't want to rule against verstappen to "affect" the race. But they had no problems DQ'ing Hamilton from Qualy because a damaged rear wing was .2mm above the threshold. Ok got it!. SMH

    Here is Palmer's analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZquZxUHtC0
    Great find buddy. I just wish the mopheads on this forum do their research more thoroughly before calling people Hamilton fanboys. At this rate, drivers would be allowed to take the race into the pit lane and through the car parks.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,976
    Like
    1
    Liked 1,137 Times in 610 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by truefan72 View Post
    Yup, simply put, they feigned lack of on-boards to provide cover as they just didn't want to rule against verstappen to "affect" the race. But they had no problems DQ'ing Hamilton from Qualy because a damaged rear wing was .2mm above the threshold. Ok got it!. SMH

    Here is Palmer's analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZquZxUHtC0
    they didn't rule against verstappen because they have been allowing that stupid behaviour for years now.

    verstappen has been doing those stupid things since his early days, and for some reason they decided it was allowed to push drivers off as long as there is no contact. and even if there's contact, they might still blame the one who gets pushed.

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=878728158950834
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABKY6nbKIL4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXTLxQMlWp0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EchF9NmKJtA

    and the DQ has nothing to do with that, it was outside allowed dimensions so the car was illegal. there is no room for interpretation, aan illegal car measn DQ.

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,461
    Like
    14
    Liked 792 Times in 654 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    they didn't rule against verstappen because they have been allowing that stupid behaviour for years now.

    verstappen has been doing those stupid things since his early days, and for some reason they decided it was allowed to push drivers off as long as there is no contact. and even if there's contact, they might still blame the one who gets pushed.

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=878728158950834
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABKY6nbKIL4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXTLxQMlWp0
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EchF9NmKJtA

    and the DQ has nothing to do with that, it was outside allowed dimensions so the car was illegal. there is no room for interpretation, aan illegal car measn DQ.
    Surprisingly, l happen to agree with you on the fact that it is clear the stewards have been very lenient with Verstappen since he was promoted to the Redbull seat. Other drivers that have done similar have met with stiff punishment. But where shall it end? Do they need a fatality for these clowns to do their jobs properly?
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •