Page 62 of 72 FirstFirst ... 12526061626364 ... LastLast
Results 611 to 620 of 717
  1. #611
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Posts
    553
    Like
    139
    Liked 578 Times in 196 Posts
    It isn't a common spaceframe. While the regulations about rollcage / chassis construction are quite prescriptive, each team has designed, and either manufactures or outsources, its own chassis.

  2. Likes: becher (4th March 2022)
  3. #612
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    690
    Like
    681
    Liked 405 Times in 214 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    Carsize is always a topic on the development table.
    Car width is the same for all 1875 mm
    Numbers I have found online are;

    Brand Wheelbase Length
    Toyota 2630 4225
    Ford 2600 ? Do anyone know?
    Hyundai 2630 4100


    So cars are pretty similar, I am guessing due to the common spaceframe.
    Difference of 120 mm btw Toyota and Hyundai in length with same wheelbase, is overhang front and rear. Might play a small part on gravel in tight corners.
    Or are the cars too similar in the measurements that it will play a role on the different surfaces?

    They are so similar in size because it is the sweetspot in regards of what is possible. I'd guess you couldn't really go any smaller due to packaging constraints and would potentially end up with a too short wheelbase if you'd were to go any smaller. Equally you wouldn't want a bigger car for obvious reasons, but you want to maximise the wheelbase (think a wheel in each corner). If we look back through the years we can see that manufacturers tried to go for a car that is round about four meters long whenever the regulations allowed.

    Also as allready mentioned it is not a spec chassis, we are thankfully still talking about three different cars, not three different silhouettes.

  4. Likes: AnttiL (4th March 2022),lancia037 (5th March 2022),pantealex (7th March 2022),Rally Hokkaido (5th March 2022),Sulland (4th March 2022),TWRC (6th March 2022)
  5. #613
    Senior Member EstWRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    14,016
    Like
    6,807
    Liked 12,229 Times in 5,253 Posts
    Looks like a Dakar car from this shot

    #8 Ott Tänak - Martin Järveoja #8
    - World Rally Champions 2019 -

  6. Likes: dimviii (8th March 2022),pantealex (9th March 2022),TWRC (8th March 2022)
  7. #614
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,961
    Like
    3,436
    Liked 9,376 Times in 4,989 Posts
    The real pity is that spaceframe chassis was really only brought in so new manufacturers could enter and re-size their relevant car model to fit.

    And after doing so, there's been no new manufacturers come in anyway....

  8. #615
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,625
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,522 Times in 4,616 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    The real pity is that spaceframe chassis was really only brought in so new manufacturers could enter and re-size their relevant car model to fit.

    And after doing so, there's been no new manufacturers come in anyway....
    What says that it was the reason for spaceframe chassis?

    Also, what says some manufacturers want to first see how this concept works before they put in dozens of millions?

  9. Likes: EstWRC (8th March 2022),Lancia Stratos (8th March 2022)
  10. #616
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    690
    Like
    681
    Liked 405 Times in 214 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AnttiL View Post
    What says that it was the reason for spaceframe chassis?

    Also, what says some manufacturers want to first see how this concept works before they put in dozens of millions?
    It was certainly one of the reasons I would guess.

  11. Likes: ouvreur (9th March 2022)
  12. #617
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,961
    Like
    3,436
    Liked 9,376 Times in 4,989 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AnttiL View Post
    What says that it was the reason for spaceframe chassis?
    'Scaling' is allowed and this couldn't be done if using a manufacturers production car bodyshell.

  13. #618
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,625
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,522 Times in 4,616 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    'Scaling' is allowed and this couldn't be done if using a manufacturers production car bodyshell.
    There's more to it, making the cars lighter and better fitted for the hybrid unit, and also allowing the common safety cell to be used, increasing the safety of the cars.

    The current three year regulation cycle cannot attract new manufacturers right now, no one will join in just for two years, unless FIA extends the current regulations somehow (maybe with everyone's own hybrid unit or something). Another thing is that these space frames could also be used for electric rally cars, if that's what the main class is in 2025, but too early to make guesses.

    And finally we must remember that keeping the current manufacturers was every bit as important as getting new ones.

  14. Likes: pantealex (9th March 2022)
  15. #619
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,961
    Like
    3,436
    Liked 9,376 Times in 4,989 Posts
    Wiki
    "Tubular space frame structures are permitted allowing for scaling of production models."

  16. #620
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,625
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,522 Times in 4,616 Posts
    Yes. It is now allowed to do scaling.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •