Results 1 to 10 of 1296
Thread: WRC future
Hybrid View
-
30th October 2020, 22:08 #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,003
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,937 Times in 1,338 Posts
For sure it's harder for privateers but the €/km cost difference of the cars will always be there, no matter who's running them. You've to consider the price difference of a GREngine or that of a transmission, suspension or any simpler, yet improved, part of a WRC car, regardind R5's, and besides the production costs of the components there's also their wear and rebuild expenses. At every test or rally day all those price differences will be reflected on each car running costs, becoming huge at the end of a season. The same applies to development.
Rally addict since 1982
-
31st October 2020, 06:03 #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2017
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 9,626
- Like
- 8,775
- Liked 10,524 Times in 4,616 Posts
But at the same time some of the components will last longer, like the GRE engine. It was estimated that the cost of using Rally2 engines would be equal to using five times more expensive GRE engines, because you would need five times more of Rally2 engines during a season.
I know that using Rally2 cars would be somewhat cheaper, you don't need to tell me that. I'm just not convinced that manufacturers are interested in putting down that money to promote something that's not in their marketing preference.
I might be wrong though. We will never be able to say which one is better because we cannot have both classes be the main class at the same time. If one fails, we can always say that the other would have succeeded.
1 Rovanpera 2 Tanak 3 Evans 4 Solberg 5 Neuville 6 Sesks 7 Pajari 8 Munster rp
[WRC Pickems 2025] R8 - DELFI...