Page 46 of 46 FirstFirst ... 36444546
Results 451 to 459 of 459
  1. #451
    Senior Member Jarek Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Wroclaw
    Posts
    8,612
    Like
    4,481
    Liked 3,305 Times in 1,741 Posts
    Standings on the official website of the ERC have just been updated:
    http://www.fiaerc.com/standings
    http://www.rallymadness.prv.pl - rally photos and movies!

  2. #452
    Senior Member Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,386
    Like
    2,011
    Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
    There are two sites that are professional in providing results during ERC/WRC rallies, rally base and eWRC.

    they have chosen to name the RRC cars differently. Rally base do not differ btw a RRC and a S2000 Fiesta. The cars are quite different, and they should be that also online. We know that officially they are all seen as S2000 cars, all RRC and all S2000. We have RRC cars from Ford, Mini and Citroen, all with a WRC light config. Quite a different animal than a S2000. Many drivers like the inbuildt toughness in the RRC, and chooses that cartype over both S2000 and R5.

    What is the reason for why the two sites chooses to name differently?

  3. #453
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,300
    Like
    2,621
    Liked 1,252 Times in 681 Posts
    The RRC and S2000 also sound quite differently..... I know which I prefer....

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  4. #454
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,522
    Like
    7,835
    Liked 11,171 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    What is the reason for why the two sites chooses to name differently?
    That both sites have nothing common?

    I know it's confusing but all RRC cars are homologated as S2000. The most correct naming shall be Super 2000 1.6T no matter how strange it looks because that is what is written in homologation papers.

    RRC is custom name used first by Prodrive or M-Sport for marketing reasons which just happen to get used by people for all 1.6T S2000 cars.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  5. Likes: Andre Oliveira (8th November 2014),mousti (8th November 2014)
  6. #455
    Senior Member Andre Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5,653
    Like
    1,608
    Liked 5,569 Times in 2,301 Posts
    Exactly Mirek. And we, on eWRC, try use allways homologation name like Peugeot 208 Vti R2, Renault Clio RS R3T....

  7. #456
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Halifax, UK
    Posts
    531
    Like
    169
    Liked 140 Times in 86 Posts
    Prodrive called their 1.6T S2000 Mini 'SPC' standing for Super Production Car - which is absolute bollocks

  8. #457
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,786
    Like
    405
    Liked 827 Times in 374 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    That both sites have nothing common?

    I know it's confusing but all RRC cars are homologated as S2000. The most correct naming shall be Super 2000 1.6T no matter how strange it looks because that is what is written in homologation papers.

    RRC is custom name used first by Prodrive or M-Sport for marketing reasons which just happen to get used by people for all 1.6T S2000 cars.
    Totally correct RRC and SPC are both marketing names. I first used to call it S2000 1.6t but RRC seems to known by most of people instead of S2000 1.6t.

  9. #458
    Senior Member PLuto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Zlin
    Posts
    8,368
    Like
    497
    Liked 3,802 Times in 1,690 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    There are two sites that are professional in providing results during ERC/WRC rallies, rally base and eWRC.

    they have chosen to name the RRC cars differently. Rally base do not differ btw a RRC and a S2000 Fiesta. The cars are quite different, and they should be that also online. We know that officially they are all seen as S2000 cars, all RRC and all S2000. We have RRC cars from Ford, Mini and Citroen, all with a WRC light config. Quite a different animal than a S2000. Many drivers like the inbuildt toughness in the RRC, and chooses that cartype over both S2000 and R5.

    What is the reason for why the two sites chooses to name differently?
    It is very simple - according to regulations, there is no RRC. This name doesnt exist, it is only product name of M-Sport. Officially it is S2000 with 1,6T engine. Thats why Rally-base has all the time written S2000.

    It is also problem to recognize on some events if the car is S2000 or RRC version only from start list.

  10. #459
    Senior Member PLuto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Zlin
    Posts
    8,368
    Like
    497
    Liked 3,802 Times in 1,690 Posts
    I see that internet in France is quite crazy as I didnt see other answers before I posted my answer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •