Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 69 of 69
  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    In what sense did 'caving in to the unions' have anything to do with British manufacturers 'producing crap'? Your comments betray a simplistic ignorance of the British car industry at that time — including the remark that it was a 'once vibrant industry'. That's a view all too commonly held, but was it ever really vibrant? I don't think so.
    Well in the 1950's Britain was the 2nd largest car producer (largely because Europe was flattened) and even in the 70's British cars still held over 50% of the market share.

    The problems with British Leyland were mostly in the hands of the weak management. This is shown by the success of foreign managed car manufacturers that have been thriving in the UK over the last 20 years. GM is closing its Opel Astra plant in Germany so it can increase production at the more efficient Astra factory in Luton.
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
    Well in the 1950's Britain was the 2nd largest car producer (largely because Europe was flattened) and even in the 70's British cars still held over 50% of the market share.
    But 'vibrant'? With some high-profile (mainly niche) exceptions, the output of British manufacturers could almost never be described as such. 'Workmanlike', maybe. This was due not least to the fact that our industry was complacent — it knew it had a large guaranteed market in Britain and the Commonwealth.

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    But 'vibrant'? With some high-profile (mainly niche) exceptions, the output of British manufacturers could almost never be described as such. 'Workmanlike', maybe. This was due not least to the fact that our industry was complacent — it knew it had a large guaranteed market in Britain and the Commonwealth.
    I think you can apply 'vibrant' to what we were making in the 60's. E-Types, MkII Jags, Mini, Austin Healy, DB5 etc.

    But the downfall was caused largely by the arrogance of the managment who ignored what the Germans were doing with the attitude of 'we beat them in the war so we know better'.
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
    I think you can apply 'vibrant' to what we were making in the 60's. E-Types, MkII Jags, Mini, Austin Healy, DB5 etc.
    Which sort of proves my point — with the exception of the Mini and possibly the MkII Jag, all of those were high-profile niche products — exceptions rather than the mainstream rule.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
    But the downfall was caused largely by the arrogance of the managment who ignored what the Germans were doing with the attitude of 'we beat them in the war so we know better'.
    It wasn't just the Germans, but also, to some extent, the French and the Italians.

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    Which sort of proves my point — with the exception of the Mini and possibly the MkII Jag, all of those were high-profile niche products — exceptions rather than the mainstream rule.
    Well name a country that had a more vibrant car industry than Britain did in the 1960s?
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,746
    Like
    3
    Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
    Well name a country that had a more vibrant car industry than Britain did in the 1960s?
    Easy, the US. It was the heyday of Ford, Chevy, Plymouth/Dodge, Pontiac, etc. Big motors and big sales. The Mustang, probably the best selling initial car offering in history, came out in 1964.
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  7. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    8,417
    Like
    501
    Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
    I remember , somewhere around 1968 or 69 , going on a trip to Toronto (about one and a half hrs) , and counting over 100 red mustangs . That's how popular they were .

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Starter
    Easy, the US. It was the heyday of Ford, Chevy, Plymouth/Dodge, Pontiac, etc. Big motors and big sales. The Mustang, probably the best selling initial car offering in history, came out in 1964.
    Yes, but you can hardly expect the same level competition from a country so much smaller.
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

  9. #69
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Starter
    The Mustang, probably the best selling initial car offering in history, came out in 1964.
    "Probably" is an understatement. The Mustang sold a million units in 20 months.

    The first of the Baby Boomers had turned 19 and Ford gave America a party. It gave post-Austerity Britain the Cortina.
    Companies like Ford and GM also gave the Baby Boomers retirement pension plans which were never saved for; that in part helps to explain GM's Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
    More generally, the Baby Boomers as a group will start to draw on pension plans around the world and that's going to cause a mass-write down of capital as they go into a period of dissaving.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •