Page 14 of 18 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 176
  1. #131
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrewmcm
    To quote Gordon Kirby in that article - "Imagine yourself fifty or sixty years ago as a fan of the beautiful Indy roadsters of the late 50s and early 60s or the classic Maserati 250F, Mercedes-Benz W196 or Dino Ferrari Formula One cars from the mid-fifties. If I suggested to you that those superb cars were about to be replaced by an invasion of tiddly little rear-engine Coopers and Lotuses you would have said I was crazy. But it happened, almost overnight, between 1958-'61 in F1 and 1963-'66 in Indy cars. "

    Common sense means nothing in Engineering. The Indy boys in the early 60s would have looked at rear-engined cars and laughed their heads off. They were soon laughing on the other side of their faces when they got blown away by rear-engined cars. Go back in time to the 1910s and show someone an A380 and they would think you were mental if you suggested that thing could fly. We only perceive the Delta Wing car to be ridiculous because it is a radical concept. It may work, it may not work. If it does work you can be sure that it will be adopted pretty sharpish by manufacturers as a lot of its technology seems to be relevant to what really matters - cars that will be on the road in future.
    All due respect to Gordon Kirby but its not a good analogy.

    The mid-engined cars was born out of the spirit of racing and competition.

    Where did Delta Wing come from? A design brief that called for gimmicky cars.

    If there was series that called for wingless cars would the DW concept succeed?

  2. #132
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DanicaFan
    Im not an engineer but with a long nose on a car like that, commen sense kicks in that it could not make a sharp turn. Its not physically possible. It would have to go wide.
    Would that be the same "common sense" that had you pick Danica to win every single IndyCar was she ever entered?

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  3. #133
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thank you for the video links, Anthony!

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  4. #134
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    5,522
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    All due respect to Gordon Kirby but its not a good analogy.

    The mid-engined cars was born out of the spirit of racing and competition.

    Where did Delta Wing come from? A design brief that called for gimmicky cars.

    If there was series that called for wingless cars would the DW concept succeed?
    Actually the Delta Wing was born as a response to a request for design by the Indy Car Series that met certain performance and safety parameters much like many other series.

  5. #135
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  6. #136
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by anthonyvop
    Actually the Delta Wing was born as a response to a request for design by the Indy Car Series that met certain performance and safety parameters much like many other series.
    True, I was being harsh.

    Such radical designs interpreted by DW, Swift, et al can be argued appropriately as gimmicks.

  7. #137
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,406
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Bowlby was in London early last week for Nissan's announcement that its turbocharged 1.6 liter direct injection four-cylinder engine will power the Delta Wing. The engine makes 300 bhp at 7,500 rpm and the 1,000 pound Delta Wing (475 kilograms dry and 575 kilos with driver and fuel) is designed to produce competitive lap times using half the fuel of a conventional car. Congratulations to NIssan for taking the plunge with the Delta Wing and shame on the domestic manufacturers for shying away from it.

    "This car was designed for what the auto industry stated they wanted," Bolwby said.
    I thought automakers were looking to make more powerful engines that consume less fuel. This is a less powerful engine that consumes less fuel. That's neither bold nor radical; that's a formula for more pack racing.
    racing-reference.info/showblog?id=1785
    9 Simple Rules as Suggested by a Nerd

  8. #138
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    5,522
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
    I thought automakers were looking to make more powerful engines that consume less fuel. This is a less powerful engine that consumes less fuel. That's neither bold nor radical; that's a formula for more pack racing.
    Pack racing is a phenomena of Flat out, all the way around, oval racing. Rarely happens in road racing. Even in spec series set-up and Talent separates most.

  9. #139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    203
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    The demonstration run at Sebring was just that - a demonstration. Issues with the gearbox (among other things) kept speed and laps down. RML will take the car from AAR and continue development in the UK.

  10. #140
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,845
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by shazbot
    The demonstration run at Sebring was just that - a demonstration. Issues with the gearbox (among other things) kept speed and laps down. RML will take the car from AAR and continue development in the UK.
    RML? I'm missing that one, who is that? Brain fart or something.
    The overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •