Results 11 to 20 of 20
-
4th August 2010, 04:23 #11
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- So Cal, Palos Verdes
- Posts
- 881
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
one step behind might be acceptable. ICS management is a mile behind.
-
4th August 2010, 05:13 #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 261
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoCalPVguy
-
4th August 2010, 05:33 #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by SUBARUTEAM
Talk about a loaded question.
-
4th August 2010, 16:57 #14
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
All these experts on here can do a better job....just ask them.
When of course they fail, then they will realize complex problems created over 15 years of stupidity don't get fixed with knee jerk answers.
Of course, that never stopped our crowd..."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
4th August 2010, 22:15 #15
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 261
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
-
5th August 2010, 02:17 #16
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- So Cal, Palos Verdes
- Posts
- 881
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SUBARUTEAM
Whats your plan? Better ride buyers?
-
5th August 2010, 03:12 #17Originally Posted by SoCalPVguy
The manufacturers you want to open this up to have all said they want no part unless they have an exclusive contract because they can't afford the development cost to be written off over a small number of cars (i.e. total car count / number of manufacturers). You'll find the same issue with engine providers.
Getting off Versus means BUYING time on some other channel.
Oh and canceling two contracts means buying out both of them. More $$$.
Great ideas if you have a huge checkbook. Otherwise just a lot of empty talk.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
5th August 2010, 12:32 #18
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garyshellThe overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
5th August 2010, 20:04 #19
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
It is amazing how the internet experts have all the answers....
Gary, nice rebuttal man...you are of course using logic..."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
6th August 2010, 20:35 #20
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 4,709
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair.
George Burns
Imagine how he would have felt about the internet.!
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/503.html"The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
He's done a run now, as has Suninen. Both a few secs behind the leading WRC2 times.
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...