Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
16th July 2010, 04:31 #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 187
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bernie Bans Team Transporter Trailer Tractors from British GP?
The Australian magazine Auto Action, ran a story that Bernie had stopped the teams from having their (and this is Auto Action's words) Transporter Trailer Tractors from the track at the British GP as Bernie controls the advertising at the tracks and the team's sponsors are getting extra exposure.
Has anyone else heard this? And what exactly would they be talking about, surely they dont mean the car transporters, how else would they get the cars there?
-
16th July 2010, 08:50 #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 561
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's sort of clarified in this story
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/85059
although it doesn't explain why it seems to only have become a problem all of a sudden. Teams have always branded their trucks and motorhomes. If I were a sponsor I'd expect them to.
See also
http://www.motorsportforums.com/foru...d.php?t=138996
-
16th July 2010, 13:03 #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,607
- Like
- 28
- Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
Strange. Why now? As with most things Bernie says or does, this is part of a bigger picture I'm sure.
-
16th July 2010, 21:32 #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 811
- Like
- 7
- Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Concorde Agreement renegotiatons start soon. Bernie's trying to mark his territory
-
17th July 2010, 09:35 #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Posts
- 2,377
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Bernie has a case of "transporter envy"
"You can mop the blood up later." - R.A. Lafferty
-
17th July 2010, 13:44 #6
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- On Chesapeake Bay.
- Posts
- 4,299
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The teams constantly worry about sponsorship and then bernie want to remove anything he isnt in control from the padddock. What exactly does he think sponsors pay for??? They aren't paying just for space on the cars. That sinage helps teams pay the bills. As long as his bottom line looks good, he could care less. I think he'd be happy with a field of blank cars and driver uniforms he could digitally impose any sponsor that he chose if they paid him directly. The teams should load the haulers and roll in protest.
HINCHTOWN!!
-
19th July 2010, 08:54 #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Posts
- 2,377
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by nigelred5"You can mop the blood up later." - R.A. Lafferty
-
19th July 2010, 22:33 #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- On Chesapeake Bay.
- Posts
- 4,299
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by wmcot
He must have one H#!! of an alimony payment.HINCHTOWN!!
-
23rd July 2010, 09:22 #9
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The decision has somewhat backfired on Bernie at Hockenheim:
Originally Posted by @willbuxtonUseful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
Wiki and WRC both now showing Solans with 3 points. However, eWRC and WRC are showing Rossel with 1 point instead of Joona for Saturday. Rossel's penalty should be applied at TC13A. So I believe...
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...