Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 145
  1. #121
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Oh sorry. I thought that the whole point of a motor race was to see who can win. Oops.
    The Mazda 787B was never the 'quickest' car so it was a misnomer that it was banned.

    It wasn't as if it blew the opposition away on outright speed like that Toyota GT ONe which was a Group C that wrangled its way into GT-1 class.

    But anyway, why do manufacturers go racing? Don't they have cars to sell? All very well Audi and Peugeot showing off how superb their TDI & HDI technology but what's the point of Aston racing diesels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Nil.

    A DB9 leaves the factory acheiving, 17.2mpg whilst an Audi A4 will do 55.2mpg (both combined cycles).
    Even with a worst case scenario the A4 2.0 TDI would still produce better mileage than a DB9. In fact I would suspect that even a 20 year old A4 2.0 TDI would still produce better mileage than a DB9.
    Therefore which car is more eco friendly/efficient? The A4 2.0 TDI.

    Warning: Science Ahead.

    Grant that the Diesel cycle is in principle less efficient than the Otto cycle, but because Diesel engines don't introduce fuel to the combustion chamber until it is actually ignited, Diesel engines aren't subject to knocking.
    Therefore, Diesel engines are not limited in their compression ratios, and as such they pull back their thermal efficiencies so far, that in the real world a turbodiesel with the same capacity as a spark engine is about a third more efficient.
    This is one of the reasons why they're use in trucks and generators.
    Lets put this another way.

    Which car is likely to have a higher mileage after 3 years, the DB9 or the A4 TDI? Which cars are you more likely to see on the roads?

  2. #122
    Senior Member Rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Sep 1666
    Posts
    10,462
    Like
    15
    Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    The Mazda 787B was never the 'quickest' car so it was a misnomer that it was banned.
    Over 24 hours it completed the furthest distance, hence the reason it won. I never once said it was the "quickest", I said it was "the best". Obviously if it won the race over 24 hours, then it must have been,

    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    But anyway, why do manufacturers go racing? Don't they have cars to sell? All very well Audi and Peugeot showing off how superb their TDI & HDI technology but what's the point of Aston racing diesels?
    Good question. Why do they go racing? To show off the brand, to use the conditions as a laboratory, because they happen to like competing to stretch their engineers?

    Obviously the point of any motor race should be to win. The point of Aston Martin racing diesels if they were going to would be to that end, but whinging to change to rules because they're simply not good enough to compete is a cop out.


    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    Lets put this another way.

    Which car is likely to have a higher mileage after 3 years, the DB9 or the A4 TDI? Which cars are you more likely to see on the roads?
    The A4 TDI would have greater mileage, because of a whole host of factors such as running costs, insurance and because their owners wouldn't use them as a daily driver.
    You're more likely to see more A4 TDIs on the roads after 3 years because they sell more of them in the first place.
    The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!

  3. #123
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,299
    Like
    2,621
    Liked 1,252 Times in 681 Posts
    Manufacturers are in Motorsport to sell cars!!! By promoting their technology, etc
    Aston Martin don't make diesels, so why would they race with one? The regs at the moment have been heavily favouring the diesels, and despite changes, this has continued.
    What we need are a level playing field between petrol, diesel and hybrids - then we may get a number of new Manufacturers - Porsche are possibly showing interest in a hybrid.

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  4. #124
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    The 3.5L engine rule was rather convenient don't you think? In one fell swoop, the only rotary engine ever raced was banned following the year it won. The ACO would have brought pressure to bear considering that these upstart Japanese dared to win their Frenchy motor race,
    Can't blame the ACO - they used FIA regs in that era because LM24 was part of the World Sports Prototype Championship

    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    Obviously the point of any motor race should be to win. The point of Aston Martin racing diesels if they were going to would be to that end, but whinging to change to rules because they're simply not good enough to compete is a cop out.
    P1 is the premier class. But its a class within a class. There should be a level playing field at the very least. It's well know that without air restrictors the NA cars would be quicker.


    Quote Originally Posted by Rollo
    The A4 TDI would have greater mileage, because of a whole host of factors such as running costs, insurance and because their owners wouldn't use them as a daily driver.
    You're more likely to see more A4 TDIs on the roads after 3 years because they sell more of them in the first place.
    On that basis GT/sportscars aren't really that bad if you only use them on a Sunday drive.

  5. #125
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    For Sale
    Posts
    11,616
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Audi has said that the new engine is gonna be a V6 Twin Turbo Diesel (so I guess they will stick with diesel even though during the 24h of LM they said it was gonna be something new)

    and talks of the R18 becoming a Coupe, as Audi says the open cockpit is no longer an advantage because of the new pitstop rules
    Brian France is a violation of Section 12-1 (actions detrimental to stock car racing)

  6. #126
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    If it's a coupe I may support audi
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  7. #127
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,299
    Like
    2,621
    Liked 1,252 Times in 681 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel
    If it's a coupe I may support audi
    Are you sure?? I didn't think you liked VW Group cars...

    Dr Wolfgang Ulrich looks as though he prefers the Coupe option.

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  8. #128
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    589
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Just got back from Le Mans, it was still a great race up to the last 50 minutes.

    After 23 hours and 10 minutes of full on racing, competition was still there, the atmosphere was electric! Then the Aston went, oh well, another year to develop and return.

    I have watched 24 heurs du Le Mans on TV, this is the first time I have attended, it certainly won't be the last!
    Age is just a state of mind and my mind is in a terrible state.
    There I was....covered in bits of grass, moss and sticky sweet wrappers.
    ....I can be a little hill....no one will notice me! :p:
    Senior member my ar$e!
    Why don\'t they just say old?

  9. #129
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,223
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    Completely clueless and missing the point.

    LM is not F1.

    Aston Martin are not in the business of selling diesels so why bother?
    How enlightening, or maybe not!

    AM want to compete against the LMP1 diesels? Than build a diesel, otherwise compete in LMP2 or GT class there are no diesels there. Or maybe they should just bugger of and shut up.
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
    They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro

  10. #130
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,223
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    ACO might as well create a diesel class.
    It looks like they already have one. No wait AM wants to win in that class with a petrol engine because beating a 9 times Le Mans winner team would be great publicity, however they can't build a better car so they are begging for help from the organizers!
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
    They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •