Results 1 to 10 of 26
Thread: Brabham BT46 Fan Car
-
23rd June 2008, 12:32 #1
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Ingerland
- Posts
- 1,578
- Like
- 0
- Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Brabham BT46 Fan Car
30 years ago it won in Sweden
Shame we don't see anything as radical as this anymore
http://www.autosrapidos.com/superaut...am-bt46b01.jpg
-
23rd June 2008, 12:41 #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
The win that shouldn't have been
I read somewhere that Tyrrell, as well as Lotus, developed their own version of 'the fan' but Bernie withdrew the car before it was banned. A field full of fan cars could have been interestingRiccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
23rd June 2008, 12:50 #3
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Ingerland
- Posts
- 1,578
- Like
- 0
- Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I can't remember but did it make a different sound?
I know the complaints were about dust from the back, but Murray had of course done Chapman over so it would have been banned.
-
23rd June 2008, 13:05 #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Don't know about the sound but there's a good article about this car here. As it says "Bernie Ecclestone (team manager/owner of Brabham) decided that it was better to sacrifice the short term advantage of the fan car than to compromise the Formula One Constructors Association (FOCA), of which he was president. This proved to be a wise move in the event of the FOCA/FISA wars of 1980 and '81."
Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
23rd June 2008, 13:12 #5
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 6,410
- Like
- 0
- Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
I'm just wondering whether they could get away running that concept now.
By that I mean the fan weighs quite a bit and with aero technology now compared to then. Up against the fan, diffusers would do a reasonable job.The world according to Taki Inoue: https://mobile.twitter.com/takiinoue/st ... 7249326080
-
23rd June 2008, 14:22 #6
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Ingerland
- Posts
- 1,578
- Like
- 0
- Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Was the 'aerodynamic parts must not move' rule aimed at cars like this?
-
23rd June 2008, 22:29 #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
- Posts
- 3,553
- Like
- 1
- Liked 78 Times in 73 Posts
Some teams developed moveable wings - steep angle of attack and high downforce at a corner and shallow angle (feathered) on the straight to reduce drag. This was the original target of a "no moveable aerodynamic devices" rule.
The rule was invoked to cover flexible and sliding skirts which you needed for optimum ground effect.
And then came the fan car. If the fan was primarily for cooling it was legal but if it was [I]primarily[I] for aerodynamics , it was illegal.Duncan Rollo
The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.
-
23rd June 2008, 23:57 #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight
"It is like a bloody great vacuum cleaner. It throws muck and rubbish at you at a hell of a rate". - Mario Andretti 16th June 1978, The Times
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
A field full of these things would have provided the most boring race yet seen with cars following each other a sufficiently large distance so that the drivers could have the luxury of actually seeing where they were going.
I think quite rightly that the FIA bit this one in the bud as soon as they did.The Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
-
24th June 2008, 03:40 #9
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Ingerland
- Posts
- 1,578
- Like
- 0
- Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rollo
But doesn't sound too nice to behind one.
-
25th June 2008, 04:15 #10
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 27
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
YouTube delivers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-eKJ6G6XAc
By the end of April, or early May 2025
[ERC] Rally Islas Canarias 2024