Results 1 to 10 of 81
Thread: S2000+ (r5)
-
12th May 2008, 13:12 #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 153
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
S2000+ (r5)
What has to be strengthened on todays S2000 cars to be able to take on the added power and torque gain from the Low Pressure Turbo ?
-
12th May 2008, 13:58 #2
I don’t know how much torque the different parts withstand but affected parts are the pistons, cylinder head bolts, connecting rods, crankshaft, gearbox, prop-shaft and drive shafts.
“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
12th May 2008, 16:16 #3
Move to IRC thread please
GG: "I'm stinky! I needa good shower and nice bowl of pasta!"
-
12th May 2008, 21:25 #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 153
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GigiGalliNo1
-
12th May 2008, 22:55 #5
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by GigiGalliNo1Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
14th May 2008, 19:51 #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,386
- Like
- 2,011
- Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
If the tech experts here should guess - how would the BHP/NM figures look on a R5 engine, adding a low pressure turbo to the R4 ?
Just to get used to that R class system !
-
14th May 2008, 23:35 #7
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,522
- Like
- 7,835
- Liked 11,171 Times in 4,437 Posts
I think we need more exact knowledge about the technical solution. At least compression ratio of NA S2000 engine is some 12-13:1 which is way too much for a turbo engine...
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
23rd May 2008, 17:03 #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,386
- Like
- 2,011
- Liked 1,369 Times in 712 Posts
New WRCar
In this weeks Autosport they have a piece on the new regulations.
As it stands now they seem to get closer to todays WRC than originally planned:
- Hydraulic gears still to be allowed (said to have longer life than mechanical)
- 100 kg heavier than today
- Not a bolt on turbo-kit but have to change the whole engine
- Changing from S2000 to S2000+ has to happen i two hours with 8 mechanics (engine in addition they said)
- No carbon, kevlar or ceramic bearings allowed
- Single-supplier turbo and intercooler
- bolt on aero kit
It is probably more, but this is the main issues.
If this is not approved on the meeting of the World Motorsport Council next month the new regs will be pure S2000 or Gr N from 2010. This since the last chance for the teams to come up with changes on the document was last week.
Are these regs ok, or are they getting to near the current ones, and it is no reason for change ?
What if they are not getting to an agreement and the new WRC will be pure S2000 and Gr N - is that ok ?
PS. I just read this so it might be something I missed or did not get right, so pls correct me if there is a need !
-
23rd May 2008, 18:36 #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 3,275
- Like
- 674
- Liked 276 Times in 183 Posts
Thank u Sulland for posting this info. It is not clear how much torque these motors will give, but I simply hope things will stay affordable for all teams. I also read something about FIA wanting the rules to be 'useless to go to a motortuner, cause no improvement possible with these sets of rules', anything about that (I hope you understand what I meant)?
Post your own splits on the net: find RallyStopwatch on the Google Play Store.
Follow posted splits on twitter with #RallySplits hashtag.
-
23rd May 2008, 18:42 #10
So S2000+ Cars dosnt go to have secuential stick gearbox?
They have allowed pads gears, like the last WRC's?
Trick
What's the first thing to come to...