I agree. Enough said.
Printable View
Essentially that was my point and I got no response except for some vitriolic off topic responses about perceived perceptions about their nature.
As i said, i wonder why there have not been 20 pages about the bottas incident or stroll. Not a single word, nothing.
The strongest criticisms came from me and a few others who are deemed "fan boys" or biased. laughable
The guy took out both Red Bulls and a Mclaren as well as damaging the other Mclaren and Stroll took out the Ferrari and nearly the Alpha Tauri.
But zero discussion on that? All those "if it were somebody else, I'd be making the same criticism" folks had nothing to say.
Many didn't even bother coming back to the forum to have their say. So this is about as clear evidence as any about the actual bias.
And as usual the last resort is to accuse those pointing out the imbalance as the actual ones biased. Etc.
Yeah, that's why I don't waste my time trying to get into those arguments with them.
That say's it all to me
If we canīt discuss Hamilton, then the forum can close.
Mia, Hamilton is controversial. Inevitably we have to discuss Hamilton. I am saying be fair and just and equitable in your discussion about him. Being overly critical or writing hate laced posts is not discussing Hamilton. It is doing hate posts which l am strongly against.
If it makes you feel better , I'll say Bottas was an idiot in that one , and Stroll was almost as bad .
But , I don't think there's any debate for anyone in that one , because I don't think anyone would disagree .
That , I think is why nobody felt the need to say it , rather than some bias against Lewis .