If Tanak had included the R5 business in the contract talks, that's bad.
Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
Printable View
If Tanak had included the R5 business in the contract talks, that's bad.
Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
Latvala got 55 pts less than Tänak in 2017 and Tänak was nr 2 in his team back then.Quote:
Originally Posted by deephouse
Latvala is pretty bad.
It is possible he will go into "I know best" /"I trust Joukhi" mode and run Latvala, Rovanpera and maybe even Suninen a bit like 2017.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oraamat
In that case the japanese ought to step in and tell him to get to his sendes. Dunno how likely that is.
No, it is not. But u being u...Quote:
Originally Posted by jparker
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
Makinen at https://www.rallit.fi/tommi-makisen-...ille-valmiina/
Of course we wanted Ott to continue with us. But I understand that in the role of a driver, the future is very carefully considered. He had now come to the conclusion that he wanted to take on new challenges
these 2 sentences imho shows something else than money/number 1 status/airplanes etc
Some days ago everybody talked about Mia as the reason why Tänak is leaving, now it is R5 deal, i wonder what comes next week? :D
the car being unreliable the most obvious one?
Ever thought to actually follow the rallies, not just read the results?Quote:
Originally Posted by robertr
I dug up a facebook speculation from June when there was talks that Tänak might go to M-Sport. This was after winning Chile and Portugal, before Sardegna. I replied "if the car breaks in Sardegna, he leaves Toyota". Could be that this was exactly what happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by EstWRC
anyone?Quote:
Originally Posted by Indreq