Lappi in the lead of WRC2. Both Finns a lot faster than Evans this time.
Printable View
Lappi in the lead of WRC2. Both Finns a lot faster than Evans this time.
Fun fact: if Tanak will win this, the 2nd,3rd and 4th drivers in the championship will not have won a single rally while 5th,6th,7th,8th and 9th did.
That's another outcome of this farce that I really hope will end next year.
Different rally winners are only good to rallysport, dont remember even, when so many different drivers won within 6 rallies. But yes, the new generation of young guns are getting more and more comfortable in rally car and this year shows the result of hard working rally teams and drivers very well. But yes, if 5th - 9th place drivers are capable to win a rally, it is only a exciting thing to rallysport.
Yes, because Sordo and Ostberg would have won otherwise.
Yeah I think it's harsh to call it a complete farce. It does show that some strength in depth is returning to the championship. And unpredictability in what has been the most predictable form of motorsport for years can't be bad. For now I think we should embrace the positives we are seeing - and then next season go back to just a single day or road sweeping for the championship leader.
In a brief conversation between Jarmo Mahonen and Colin Clark yesterday he did sound like it might be changing next year.
I respect everyone's opinion (of course)...
But I think all those Loeb victories, and Ogier afterwards have a bit obfuscated your meaning of "exciting".
The current rules create somewhat strange situation when those who are higher in the championship standings instead of pulling away have to defend their lead until the championship comes on asphalt where if they can stay ahead will enjoy having a reasonable advantage over their pursuers. It's not that black and white like some portray it. The somewhat unpredictable outcome is not that bad. It gives motivation to other teams and drivers and it's fun for spectators (I admit not for all). It's just different rules but it's same for all. In the end it's a game and it depends on everyone how he plays his cards.
Maiden stage victory for Lefebvre.
Lefebrvre wins SS15! Now it's 11,4 s between him and Breen.
Fun with younger drivers start driving fast. The question to ask is how well has this generation been. Loeb, of course, and perhaps Ogier, but then? If you think of the 90s with Sainz, McRae, Burns, Eriksson, Mäkkinen, Kankunen, Auriol, Gronholm with more so there was always 5 maybe 10 drivers who could win a race. Feels like it's been very thin at the top the last 10 years and too easy for Loeb and Ogier to line up the championship.
No, he didn't. When Loeb retired Ogier didn't defeat him every here and there, quite the opposite.
Mads Østberg @MadsOstberg
SS16 7:35.1 "Managed to take 1 tenth of Dani, not bad eh? hehe. Its difficult, you have to fight for what you can fight for" #wrc
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmXnkVRWAAATFU_.jpg
wuhuhuuuuuuuu
It was just a normal question, but ok, I see where this is going, time to stop.
19.5 seconds gap. That's good for Tanak he extended it. He can do it tomorrow if he doesn't make mistakes... Let's see.
Come on, You're not so stupid. In 2012 which was the last full season of Loeb Ogier didn't defeat Loeb even once except when Loeb retired but even in those cases Ogier wasn't ahead. Loeb had 9 victories and Ogier 0 in 2012, he even had 0 podiums. Loeb had 270 points and Ogier 41 (10th in the championship behind Prokop). You definition of sending into retirement is funny...
Sat 17:25 - SS16: Bertelli
"There was a big bee in the car and it was very distracting. Later I missed a junction and lost five seconds."
Kruuda stopped after the start with oil leak...
when was the last time a Ford won ?
hardly. Loeb had been in a WRC drive since 2002, first full season 2003, that's a pretty long time. Just because Ogier appeared at the end of Loeb's career doesn't mean he 'sent' him into retirement.
On the other hand, for example McRae was more or less left without a drive when the rules changed to 2 car teams and Loeb was preferred.