Do people still buy it? The only car in which Tänak didn't have mystery problems or that didn't fit him was a dominant one. I think that says enough.
Printable View
Do people still buy it? The only car in which Tänak didn't have mystery problems or that didn't fit him was a dominant one. I think that says enough.
Tanak did test the Puma on gravel at M-Sport before he signed and went ahead.
Now he says him and the car are so far apart that he wants a radical change in design philosophy !
He should be keeping such comments behind closed doors.
Exactly! On the side note - i doubt Tanaks team (not M-Sport) are paying to any PR pro - those statements are getting toxic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
Actually from the get go he said that changes are needed. And the only thing that pushed him away from Hyundai was the development process. He got that promise from M-Sport but it takes time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
And why's everyone bashing this interview when he says the car is good but not for his driving style. But when you look at some stages it's not that bad at all.
It's his stage end commentaries which are with a bad tone, this interview does sound like an honest assesment about the whole situation.
Sent from my DN2103 using Tapatalk
This is starting to sound like Auriol and ‘The Feeling’….
Let’s see what MSport can come up with.
Just let me remind you when Tänak got the car to his liking in TGR for JML it became undriveableQuote:
Originally Posted by doubled1978
Sent from my DN2103 using Tapatalk
Which setup needs Puma to match the style of Ott?Quote:
Originally Posted by cali
I'd argue at least half of it was due to Latvala crumbling under a strong team mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by cali
And other personal issuesQuote:
Originally Posted by becher
I'm not gonna argue :DQuote:
Originally Posted by becher
Sent from my DN2103 using Tapatalk