If Mikkelsen has know about VW exit before, he probably had a seat this year. With or without some sort of backing. If ogier had refused M-sport, Mikkelsen would been driving ogiers car.
Sent fra min XP7700 via Tapatalk
Printable View
If Mikkelsen has know about VW exit before, he probably had a seat this year. With or without some sort of backing. If ogier had refused M-sport, Mikkelsen would been driving ogiers car.
Sent fra min XP7700 via Tapatalk
Is it common for driver's contract to have clause that require mandatory minimal performance, and if not met, contract to be terminated?
You suggest he could pay but he wont. Is there any proof of this ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Franky
I believe his family stopped paying for his rallying a long time ago.
lol...Quote:
Originally Posted by jparker
Like i said and (i think) N. O. T. said, the trophy is a farse. Better open the trophy to 2017 cars... privateer is the driver/team not the car.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
I don't agree. Privateer trophy have no reason to exist with official WRC cars imho. They're using the same car as the championship and there is already a trophy for it: the world championship. If they want they can win it. With 2016 cars is ok but not with new ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre Oliveira
There is no reason to find more than one winner like in the kindergarten.
Veiby said so in an article on parcferme.noQuote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
So Serderidis last and first in Monte Carlo is better? Privateers do a sacrifice to be there and no media attention. Not a championship, a trophy to they.
Link ?Quote:
Originally Posted by SubaruNorway
He has been a paid driver for many years now. Who would his source of support be ?
I kind of agree, but the others have the money for 2017 cars so they dont really need the media/trophy for sponsors...Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre Oliveira