😅😷
Printable View
SS15 very similar, except they had fixed cameras and actually showed images from those. For interviews:
WRC2 Tidemand interview
WRC2 Kopecky nothing (had a puncture)
WRC3 Mikkelsen nothing
WRC3 Solberg nothing
WRC3 Lindholm interview (he was very surprised they want him to talk English)
WRC2 Fourmaux interview
Here is how many times WRC3 top 3 and Lindholm got interview during 3 days on a track with crew at stopline and not having to go anywhere:
Huttunen 1 (PS end, he was put in front of WRCs), Solberg 1, Mikkelsen 0, Lindholm 2
First 3 WRC3 crews ended 6-8 and ahead of all WRC2.
WRC2 get "priority" running order (which is a disadvantage on gravel as Østberg says), one of the reasons is that they get shown more on TV.... but when there is time for WRC3s why "deliberately" skip them when they are running high in overall?
On top of that in Monza you got the funny situation after many stages where they "end" the allive feed with showing overall standings with WRC2 crews jumping 3-4 places in stage.
;)
He, Emil was joking with Molly. (who lives in Norway, speaks also swedish)
They ask on LIVE 1st in english and after that "with your own language"
Emil is swedish speaking finn, so finnish is his 2nd language.
I bet they did those stage end interviews many times for press, that SS15 was for LIVE, usually it wasn´t.
Not just a camera, it's three cameras with the transmitter, and after installing they likely need to do a test to see that the camera angles are correct and the transmitter is working. I don't know how much time it takes, but like I said there should be a time slot for this operation that wouldn't be away from the normal service. Normally the cameras are installed and removed outside the rally schedule. Would the scrutineers need to also check that the cameras are installed safe?
Well, they are all connected. FIA has a deal with the WRC Promoter.Quote:
And don’t entry fees go to the FIA and not the promoter?
You can call it an excuse, I call it understanding the reality. Life is happier when you don't complain about everything :)Quote:
There must be some better solutions that can be arrived at instead of just thinking of excuses all the time.
It's a bigger problem that WRC2 and WRC3 are separated while the performances are so equal. And like I've said before, if all the drivers would be in the same series, it would be tricky to decide in advance whose car gets the camera (assuming it cannot be moved to another car during the rally).
Simplest solution would be to run all Rally2/R5 in WRC2 and Rally3 cars in WRC3.
Also to make a WRC4 championship, for Rally4 and 5 cars, where JWRC is incorporeted, but also gets JWRC points according to internal classification.
JWRC will be with Rally4 cars in future?
In 20 they used the R2t-19, but i will be very surprized if those cup cars are not upgraded with Rally4 kit for 2021.
But JWRC will still run by M-Sport Poland with Fieastas.
But we need a 2wd championship, and the the JWRC crews can fight for 2 championships. If others would like to use another brand, where they get a better deal, they should have a title to fight for!
Is this another DirtFish article with a silly mistake on the year? It reads like it could be 22, instead of 21. But the headline says different
https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/adela...t-wrc-in-2021/
Sent from my SM-A705FN using Tapatalk