What is your point ??? And where is the data to back your claim of standstill times?
Printable View
Pip, pip, pip! :ninja:
Final qualifying
1. Verstappen
2. Hamilton
3. Norris
4. Perez
5. Bottas (2nd to 5th w/penalty)
6. Gasly
7. Leclerc
8. Tsunoda (pending penalty)
9. Alonso
10. Stroll
Max “the man” again.
Russell and Williams in the top ten, wow. I don't wanna jinx it but l hope he picks up a point or two tomorrow. Poor Tsunoda got a three-place grid penalty from a brilliant 8th, for blocking Bottas. F1 can be tough sometimes and rewarding at the same time.
https://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id...ists-french-gp
My point is clear, that you keep stating quicker pit stops, regardless of it being the case or not. The pit in/pit out, inlaps and outlaps all have a hand as well.
Pit lane times are often found on several sites, and pit stopped time is usually shown on timing during the race.
Hamllton had a 2.2 stop, hardly a slug.
Fair points.. the Mercs do seem to have a low speed traction deficit compared to RBR.
It is suggested in my previous link that RBR may be using some sort of automated pit light system which if legal and true would remove human latency from their pit stop procedure, which could be worth around 2 tenths.
Done well, I'd expect such a system to also be safer than a human controlled one so maybe Merc ought to emulate rather than neutralise their rivals system via the FIA under a false safety precedent.
Makes you wonder what else they are grasping at behind the scenes.