Page 65 of 70 FirstFirst ... 15556364656667 ... LastLast
Results 641 to 650 of 692
  1. #641
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    142
    Like
    199
    Liked 14 Times in 5 Posts
    Not sure if already posted but Paddon crash from a distance.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixrR4qQ_F2k

  2. Likes: AL14 (13th June 2016),dimviii (13th June 2016),satnav (13th June 2016),stefanvv (13th June 2016)
  3. #642
    Senior Member satnav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    388
    Like
    883
    Liked 217 Times in 113 Posts

  4. Likes: AL14 (13th June 2016),arko5 (13th June 2016),cali (13th June 2016),danon (13th June 2016),dimviii (13th June 2016),Lundefaret (14th June 2016),Mirek (13th June 2016),pantealex (14th June 2016),stefanvv (13th June 2016)
  5. #643
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    9
    Like
    2
    Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
    My video, with drone ! Enjoy it

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHQcss-iPQQ

  6. Likes: b3637853 (13th June 2016),dimviii (13th June 2016),Rally Power (14th June 2016),satnav (13th June 2016)
  7. #644
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    Broke rules? I find it more peculiar that a shape of a windowwhich even didn´t fit on that doormodel can make FIA fine 50k Euros is most unethical.

    They could have said: "Hey, guys, you´ve messed this up with the scrutineer/homolgationdepartment at FIA and on Monday morning you have to fix this immediately so papers are in order next rally in Poland. Or else we have to fine you at least 5000 Euros."

    To me it had looked more justice than this 50k fine for almost nothing.

    Imagine how much surprise the scrutineers and stewards would have if this were pressed further..

    "That window didn't fit----50,000 please.

    Wait, we can't seem to fit this intercooler---under this hood..(ching ching) 70,000 and this gearbox seems to have some different gears 10,000; 10,000; 10,000---and it has a LSD inside that doesn't fit.. 200,000 ching---
    and this control arm is about twice as long and made of tube---the Original is a steel stamping.....133,000 thank you, and it what do you call this suspension? 1 million Euros please, it is not in conformity to the original.."


    Please remit ALL YOUR MONIES!! REACH FOR THE SKY STUNGATZ! Dis is a stick up!"



    or maybe something like this (substituting "rally team" for "Army")
    http://<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cNZKUozrBl4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cNZKUozrBl4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  8. #645
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,118
    Like
    5,647
    Liked 2,841 Times in 1,614 Posts
    Good one John!
    However rules are rules regarding gearboxes, engines weights overal etz. That´s fine to me.

    But rear windows? Me o mine, that´s just too much fining 50k . Who made that rule up?
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  9. #646
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,540
    Like
    368
    Liked 643 Times in 285 Posts
    Hint:
    FIA heads can make a fortune out of fluids weight change if they charge €10 000 per gram difference.

  10. #647
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    But rear windows? Me o mine, that´s just too much fining 50k . Who made that rule up?
    It's the car makers themselves who wanted this extreme system of homologations so that they secure selling more spare parts to privateers. No heardache from my side.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  11. #648
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,118
    Like
    5,647
    Liked 2,841 Times in 1,614 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    It's the car makers themselves who wanted this extreme system of homologations so that they secure selling more spare parts to privateers. No heardache from my side.
    Ok. But fines 50k for 36g? 1390 Euros/gram.
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  12. #649
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    406
    Like
    1
    Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
    Biggest problem with the windows wasnt the weight,but different kind of attachment of windows to the bodyshell

  13. Likes: dimviii (13th June 2016),Mirek (13th June 2016),pantealex (14th June 2016)
  14. #650
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    Ok. But fines 50k for 36g? 1390 Euros/gram.
    Per, I have written that at least five times already. They were not penalized for the weight! Please read the documents again. The shape of the windows was wrong (the part which is not visible and by which the window is attached to the door).
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •