Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markabilly
    Good guessing, wow, for someone who never met or treated her.
    Or were you her doctor or some other member of the medical community who killed her?
    You have no evidence to suggest things were one way or the other!

    The NHS has many, many failings, however it's a cherished part of Britain, so do not use it as a pawn in yet another American polictical debate!
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan H
    Typical Daily Mail article.
    Exactly. Their agenda will be to highlight cases which, on the surface, justify the current government's top down reorganisation (some would say privatisation) of the NHS. Of course under a private insurance based heathcare system cases such as this would never happen.
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Even if (and given that paper's track record it's a massive "if") the article is factually correct, it's hardly evidence that the NHS is failing. It treats literally millions of people every month, and as such it's almost certain that every once in a while something will go wrong. To the individual and their family that's devestating, and I'm not belittling their suffering, but statistically it's damn-near irrelevant.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I've found the link to the story as it appears on the Mail's website (which in turn appears to have been lifted word-for-word from a local newspaper):
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-hospital.html

    It's very sparse on facts, but one part which didn't get reproduced in the OP (and by the way, that website is laughable) was this:

    'From July to October there was talk of another operation and then between November and December there were three or four postponements and she was becoming so institutionalised we decided to get her home until an operation was certain.

    'It was a blessing because although neither of is could have guessed it - it gave us a last month together.

    'Nevertheless, she was unable to take proper nourishment and went into the operation on the better side of a low state - she was very weak.'
    Now it would be foolish to dabble in conjecture, but I wonder if the family's decision to look after the patient at home instead of letting the hospital do their job was a factor. There's clearly more to this story than the newspaper has reported. Tragic it may be, but it's hardly typical of the NHS.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  5. #15
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    Don't let facts get in the way of the bashing, Dave.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dylan H
    Why were the procedures cancelled? If it was due to logistical reasons she'd have skipped to the head of the queue and her procedure would have been performed within a week of her cancellation. Given that the article mentions her weakened state her op was most likely cancelled repeatedly as she represented a high anaesthetic risk.
    Several years ago I had an operation cancelled twice because my INR was extremely elevated. I had a genuine risk of bleeding to death on the table, which far outweighed the potential benefits of the surgery. No complaints from me.
    Again, selective reporting by the Daily Mail with a refusal to clarify exactly why the procedures were delayed, most likely because it didn't fit their agenda.
    In fairness, more likely they didn't know. The article is either ripped off from thisistotalessex (earlier time of publication), or it's agency copy. Either way, they didn't bother doing any actual journalism.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    6,084
    Like
    0
    Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark
    You have no evidence to suggest things were one way or the other!

    The NHS has many, many failings, however it's a cherished part of Britain, so do not use it as a pawn in yet another American polictical debate!
    nor does he, but clearly the "cherished" failed
    Only the dead know the end of war. Plato:beer:

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    6,084
    Like
    0
    Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jag_Warrior
    Silly woman! She should have come to the U.S. so she could have been denied treatment (unless she had good private insurance or lots of cash) right from the start. See, that way, she and her family wouldn't have needlessly gotten their hopes up.

    That's what makes this the greatest dang country on earth! Unless you're dirt poor and can get on Medicaid, are old and can get on Medicare, are rich and can foot the bill yourself or have a private insurance plan and you won't exceed your annual or lifetime limits... you can spend your remaining days with your family. Why waste time begging doctors and hospitals to treat you, when all they see when they look at you is a lease payment on their BMW 750/Mercedes S Class?

    There, that's my happy thought to start the month of April.

    working for a government agency always provides the best insurance and she would have been well taken care, unlike many working stiffs whose taxes pay for those nice health benefits
    Only the dead know the end of war. Plato:beer:

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markabilly
    nor does he, but clearly the "cherished" failed
    I don't think anybody has ever suggested that the NHS is perfect in every way, but it's equally moronic to use one isolated case (even ignoring the flaws in the reporting) to suggest that the whole system is failing.

    As I said, while the case is clearly tragic for those concerned, it's statistically a non-event when you consider the millions who are successfully treated.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,345
    Like
    0
    Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
    I'm not sure which is worse, http://www.ihatethemedia.com or the Daily Mail.

    A former Director of the Great Britain’s National Health Service...
    Margaret Hutchon, according to the original piece, was a non-executive member of the board of directors with Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust.
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •