Page 89 of 222 FirstFirst ... 3979878889909199139189 ... LastLast
Results 881 to 890 of 2215
  1. #881
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    107
    Like
    0
    Liked 68 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lundefaret View Post
    Not by a mile. Finland is the only country in the World where Rally is seen as a national sport. The only two countries I can think of that actually come close is Barbados and Ireland.
    Though France has had two great champions, rally by no means a competitor of bigger sports like soccer.

    Finland is the rally capital of the world, and by being that, and a country that can manage huge technological engineering feats (like Nokia), Finland can be a great place to run a rally team from.
    The national sport of Finland is ice hockey. Rally was the national sport maybe in the 70's and 80's, but not anymore. The regular people hardly knows the names of the Finnish drivers nowadays.

    In many ways the Finns are stuck in the 80's and 90's in rallying. They still believe the same path for the success which was used during the years of success. But it's a different world now. Our French friends develop the sport from the hobby level to the top-level sport.

    Finland was to be the mental home of rallying, now it is the mental developing country of the rally world. Unfortunately.

  2. Likes: dimviii (23rd December 2015)
  3. #882
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by giù tutto! View Post
    The national sport of Finland is ice hockey. Rally was the national sport maybe in the 70's and 80's, but not anymore. The regular people hardly knows the names of the Finnish drivers nowadays.

    In many ways the Finns are stuck in the 80's and 90's in rallying. They still believe the same path for the success which was used during the years of success. But it's a different world now. Our French friends develop the sport from the hobby level to the top-level sport.

    Finland was to be the mental home of rallying, now it is the mental developing country of the rally world. Unfortunately.

    That last bit is kinda of hard to swallow..espeically when you have F-cup which has such good drivers---and dozens of them---scores of them..
    In all of "not even starting to develop country' USA with maybe 300-320 total drivers from a population of 320 million, the best USA can do in the best car a guy can buy (because to get better you will not buy the car, they give you the car) is slower than your best F-cup guys.

    If Finland has does anything wrong in rally, they made the same mistake as everybody else and listened to marketing and promotion guys and believed them when they said promotion is the key to happiness..

    Competition is the key...frequent, hard challenging, close competition...
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  4. Likes: Hartusvuori (23rd December 2015),Rallyper (23rd December 2015)
  5. #883
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmi View Post
    I genuinely think Toyoda made his decision because Tommi convinced him that his way (smaller, more hands on, family team) is better. And now we have to wait and see (and hope) that Tommi was right.
    Modern rally with these cars that have zero connection to the road cars they are badged as is now hugely like other mainly meaningless autosports in that it is first an engineering and budgetary exercise in the designing of specialty parts and that is a very portable thing and is done with keyboards...And a keyboard to type and draw on can be in any location..Frankfurt or Nagoya or Puuppola....as long as they have telephone line and electricity..

    But that is the basic starting position.

    Then to be sucessful you need first experience in knowing what is needed, and judgement in deciding what is good...and that is not linked to location but is inside the heads of people..

    Then you need to confirm what you believe inside the head..

    That calls for practice and honest assessment of what you do.

    In that, being based in Puuppola is an advantage.
    Last edited by janvanvurpa; 23rd December 2015 at 20:05.
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  6. Likes: Rallyper (23rd December 2015)
  7. #884
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 777 Times in 419 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    That last bit is kinda of hard to swallow..espeically when you have F-cup which has such good drivers---and dozens of them---scores of them..
    In all of "not even starting to develop country' USA with maybe 300-320 total drivers from a population of 320 million, the best USA can do in the best car a guy can buy (because to get better you will not buy the car, they give you the car) is slower than your best F-cup guys.

    If Finland has does anything wrong in rally, they made the same mistake as everybody else and listened to marketing and promotion guys and believed them when they said promotion is the key to happiness..

    Competition is the key...frequent, hard challenging, close competition...
    That last section makes sense to me. The reason Ogier manage to win so often is because he keeps his calm always no matter what and only focus 100% on the task and he has done that by getting very good at competition and not stressing himself when he is in front.

    Also
    ...about Toyota TMR Gazoo whatever, I think it is too early to say anything. It all depends on who they manage to get as driver in the team. Like Lundefaret often says, the driver makes a huuuge difference. Ogier would still win in the Msport cars... the VW only makes it easy for him. I am pretty sure that there is a lower wall between TMG and TMR than we think. If they are building the engines, I am pretty sure they supply testing data and CADs and other stuff as well.

    Does anyone here in the forum know much about Tommis group N building before he stuck his nose into the Toyota operations? How good were his cars? Did/do they have any known issues? Etc etc? That would leave us with an indication of how well they could do.

  8. #885
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
    Does anyone here in the forum know much about Tommis group N building before he stuck his nose into the Toyota operations? How good were his cars? Did/do they have any known issues? Etc etc? That would leave us with an indication of how well they could do.

    Akta er, pojken!

    In Group N they could have made the best Group N prepared cars possible and if the basic car has some serious desirn problem there is only so much that can be done..
    Example is in Group N Subaru they are stuck with the Subaru EJ20 motor basic dimensions and of course position far ahead of the front axle..
    The EJ20 motor (I have built 3 for rally) has a cylinder bore of 92mm...And must breathe thru a 32mm restrictor....
    32mm mean the poor thing will not be happy to make revs above some point---a problem for all Group N4 cars...so as we know, they all make the motor into a "mid-range torque monster" and to do that you begin with making much higher static compression ratio and funny turbocharger pressure ratio..
    There the size of the bore at 92mm becomes a problem that cars like most modern desigs do not have when they have bore size between 85 to 86mm. Those engines can tolerate much higher cylinder pressure with much less chance of detonation simply from the distance the flame must travel to be complete (in the time allowed).

    So Tommi M Rally could do everything perfect on a GroupN Subaru, and still have problem with great results because of things completely out of their control.

    So careful and not take things out of context..

    ( I don't know if you are intimately familiar with the bore/stroke of the typical engines that have done so well in the 2 liter days...but all the best were around 85mm bore and 89 stroke, or many were clustered at 86mm bore and 86mm stroke---I build engines.... )

    God Jul till alla rally dårar därute i världen.
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  9. Likes: dimviii (23rd December 2015),Rallyper (23rd December 2015)
  10. #886
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 777 Times in 419 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    Akta er, pojken!

    In Group N they could have made the best Group N prepared cars possible and if the basic car has some serious desirn problem there is only so much that can be done..
    Example is in Group N Subaru they are stuck with the Subaru EJ20 motor basic dimensions and of course position far ahead of the front axle..
    The EJ20 motor (I have built 3 for rally) has a cylinder bore of 92mm...And must breathe thru a 32mm restrictor....
    32mm mean the poor thing will not be happy to make revs above some point---a problem for all Group N4 cars...so as we know, they all make the motor into a "mid-range torque monster" and to do that you begin with making much higher static compression ratio and funny turbocharger pressure ratio..
    There the size of the bore at 92mm becomes a problem that cars like most modern desigs do not have when they have bore size between 85 to 86mm. Those engines can tolerate much higher cylinder pressure with much less chance of detonation simply from the distance the flame must travel to be complete (in the time allowed).

    So Tommi M Rally could do everything perfect on a GroupN Subaru, and still have problem with great results because of things completely out of their control.

    So careful and not take things out of context..

    ( I don't know if you are intimately familiar with the bore/stroke of the typical engines that have done so well in the 2 liter days...but all the best were around 85mm bore and 89 stroke, or many were clustered at 86mm bore and 86mm stroke---I build engines.... )

    God Jul till alla rally dårar därute i världen.
    I work with completely different engines. The ones I have worked with have had a bore in the range of 460 to 900mm and a stroke of 940 to 2920mm... So well let's just say I don't know much about the torque figures of the tiny little sewing machines you talk about

    Go Jul på dig med förresten!

    Also I don't work with FIA regulated restrictors and my engines can breathe as freely as they want to...

    Anyway, back to topic. I am not entirely sure how wider bore and less stroke can give more torque... It seems to me that the logical thing would be the complete opposite. Those motorcycle engines that rev up to 15 000 rpm usually have a pretty large bore to stroke ratio if I am not mistaken.

    Still... There has got to be other group N Subaru that you can compare them to and if they have inherit problems, the guy has a problem with his manufacturing philosophy. Does anyone here hold such info?

  11. #887
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,121
    Like
    5,649
    Liked 2,842 Times in 1,615 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by giù tutto! View Post
    The national sport of Finland is ice hockey. Rally was the national sport maybe in the 70's and 80's, but not anymore. The regular people hardly knows the names of the Finnish drivers nowadays.

    In many ways the Finns are stuck in the 80's and 90's in rallying. They still believe the same path for the success which was used during the years of success. But it's a different world now. Our French friends develop the sport from the hobby level to the top-level sport.

    Finland was to be the mental home of rallying, now it is the mental developing country of the rally world. Unfortunately.
    So wher do you suggest they should have their HQ?
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  12. #888
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    So wher do you suggest they should have their HQ?
    Snipp, Snapp, Snorum, eller Hej Basalorum?
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  13. #889
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,121
    Like
    5,649
    Liked 2,842 Times in 1,615 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    Agree. Suomissa that is!
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  14. #890
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    107
    Like
    0
    Liked 68 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    So wher do you suggest they should have their HQ?
    To Trollhättan.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •