Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
13th January 2010, 19:27 #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Don't Fear the Future, but Brian Barnhart does?
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...ont-fear-2012/
The latest from Robin Miller. His take on the new car, the new engine possibly, and how Barnhart is having kittens worrying about losing control of the formula. Robin lays out a pretty good rationale for how this is the chance to breathe a lot of life into the sport, even tho I suspect we can quibble on some of it. That said, the last few paragraphs he basically calls out Barnhart for trying to reign in this diversity in design. I don't know if that is fair or not, but I do know that the status quo isn't working for a lot of people, and he better grasp THAT."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
13th January 2010, 22:13 #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 1,747
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well it's on Brian if the safety of the new cars isn't up to snuff, and if the racing isn't exciting. I'd say he has a lot of pressure to make sure they do it right. I however, disagree with what is apparently Brian's mindset that, as-is, the IRL is moving in the right direction. What I see is a series that's gotten pretty stale in loads of ways, and needs to try something different. A very unique car design is important in separating it from the common perception of F1 racing that the American public generally is not interested in. I do think the IRL needs to position itself, with its new car design, as an exciting and very unique alternative to NASCAR, and not simply slower F1 cars that run on a variety of tracks. I'm not saying that Bowlby's design is superior or Dallara's new car is superior. We simply don't know. But I do think that the more extreme changes in look, handling, and performance, will pay off bigger for the league.
-
13th January 2010, 23:54 #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by NickFalzone"Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
14th January 2010, 00:35 #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- North Center, Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 2,107
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
Robin speaks of the old days of multiple chassis & engines, and wanting to see Dan Drinan & Joe Devin build cars for the 500, low costs, etc. And yet he never explains how this new car could change all of this nor if it even will. All this sounds like a single make car (by Dallara in the USA) with engines by Honda. WOW, what a change.
And it will have even less horse power @ 325 hp. Really, 325? A midget engine produces between 325 & 400 hp @ 900 lbs. You really think a 325 hp turbo will get the ratings up?
It worries me that you people are so wrapped up in this idea of change that none of you are asking if it will be any better.Most posters on this forum can't think past their own screen names...
-
14th January 2010, 00:44 #5
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- North Center, Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 2,107
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
Once again where does Robin show this car will keep Penske & Ganassi from winning all of the time?
I think that most of you have nostalgia bias and remember past events as having been better than they really were at the time.Most posters on this forum can't think past their own screen names...
-
14th January 2010, 01:43 #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 218
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This new car has basically everything the old car has. Apart from its low horsepower, but irl adopted much lower horsepower than CART anyway back in the day, hence not a backstep. The rest are good----low cost, innovations, possibilities of putting on a good show etc. Loving the idea. There is always one thing or another to be skeptical about before innovations, and it is right in doing so; but the thing is that irl is now in such a miserable state that it needs to find a radical new way and test them out. irl is basically now in a "what have you got to lose" situation now.
-
14th January 2010, 03:10 #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Posts
- 66
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wouldn't take every word from Miller as gospel nor do I approve of Barnhart's 'ultra-conservative, zero innovation, keep things as they are' mindset.
-
14th January 2010, 05:12 #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 857
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyracefan
-
14th January 2010, 05:16 #9
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by gofastandwynn
Having one mandated chassis with no changes allowed is spec racing. Last Time I looked, no SCCA spec racing series ever made really compelling television.
As for the power, I want more of it. I am not in agreement with Miller on that score. I want them running 800 hp with very minimal wings...I want to see guys manhandlling the cars through the corners on roadcourses in full out slides...On the ovals, I want to see them run 240 down the straight at Indy and actually have to brake down to about 190 or so to make the corner...Then the driver's ability will make a difference.
As for Penske and Ganassi, they will win more than the others just on their large engineering and support, and their superior money advantage. That said, under the current strict rules, they will dominate because they can perfect everything to the 10th one of a percent that the others cant, and if everyone is equal, this will often win. In a series where there are many options on setup and chassis, the blind squirrel will find more nuts theory kicks in. Andretti's teams will find something and win a race or two. Maybe Rahal Letterman will find something and win ( providing they are still in the biz)
AS for Robin's theory on cheaper racing, I think he is thinking this can be a "junk" formula like Indy had in the 30's. Not sure how he figures that will happen, but I think he wants local guys to at least be given a set of rules and a "box" and let them try to build a race car to compete with. Noble thought...beats everyone in a Dallara with no mods allowed and a sealed Honda."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
14th January 2010, 05:19 #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilf
Tell me who designed this idea? Brian.... so the proof is in the results. The teams are all running identical race cars because they have no other choice. It isn't Roger Penske's idea trust me..."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
1 Rovanpera 2 Tanak 3 Sordo 4 Ogier 5 Neuville 6 Evans 7 Fourmaux 8 Solberg Rallyper
WRC PICKEMS 2024 - Round 5 RALLY...